terre des Hommes and the mild-making process from the term 'child abuser' to 'pedosexual'

9 January 2018

Terre des Hommes is a fantastic organization when it lies at the Telegraaf and other mainstream media. They fight against child abuse and are a recognized 'charity', so that you can donate to them fiscally. The Postcode Lottery also pours a lot of money into the organization. Terre des Hommes is apparently opposed to the exploitation of children and child prostitution, and of course we all have a warm heart. Still, there is a little itching on my nose when I see such an organization. It is unintentionally immediately reminiscent of Jimmy Savile who grew up in England with his BBC children's programs and of which after his death he became known to include 60 children in the Stoke Mandeville hospital had abuse (including seriously ill eight year old children).

David Icke suspected Savile during his lifetime of this abuse, but just as with the Dutch Senator whose child abuse collection was found only after his death, Edward Brongersma, the abuse of Savile was also revealed only after his death. And probably we have only seen the tip of the iceberg, because it is of course not convenient that Savile was a personal friend of Prince Charles and was carried on by the British elite and the royal family. Not that I have any proof that Terre des Hommes is a cover organization that is basically an abuse network behind. You would have to infiltrate for that and I suspect that they will not offer me a job. So for now we have to assume that Terre des Hommes really wants to prevent sexual exploitation of children. My nose, however, continues to itch; you sometimes have that. There is something in their activities.

Terre des Hommes secretly seems to contribute in the slow way towards accepting sexual abuse, through the acceptance and normalization of pedophilia and making this abuse mild for sexual preference. Child abusers are nowadays already called 'pedophiles', but it seems that Terre des Hommes contributes to the marketing towards making this term even milder. From now on, a child abuser is no longer a 'pedophile', but a 'pedosexual'. In these terms a 'love' and 'sexual preference' is packaged. Jimmy Savile also liked very much the deadly eight-year-old boys he raped. We seem to have to accept that it is about 'love' and 'sexual preference', while practice is mostly about pure abuse of very young children. And despite the fact that Terre des Hommes announces in the video below that she is hunting for these 'pedosexuals' (the term to make it mild), she seems to be fulfilling the function of 'punishment prevention'. Let's analyze what the Telegraaf and other media do as if it were a great step in the right direction: the use of lok advertisements. First look at the movie that De Telegraaf published about it:

Pay particular attention to the opening sentence of Gideon van Aartsen in the video above. In fact, he more or less states that it is all about a taboo on homosexuality among young people and that these young boys are raped when they come in contact with older homosexuals. Wait a minute, Mr. Aartsen. That is all nice and kind of you, but is the real sexual abuse not related to the cases of Jimmy Savile, Robert M. and many more of that kind of serious matters that really involved very young children in the sexual abuse of babies? It seems that child abuse in the image of people must be positioned especially in the homosexual nature and the gray area created by the awkward age limit. Young boys are ashamed of their sexual orientation and are blackmailed by Aartsen for the fact that they have not yet come out of the closet. "They then meet someone who starts a flirt and then they are raped by friends of that person with whom the flirt starts". So it's all in the category 'I actually want it, but because there is a taboo on it, it ends up in the illegal circuit and leads to criminal offenses'.

Let's take a serious look at what Terre des Hommes is going to do about it. Terre des Hommes goes between sex ads. So they are going to offer sex ads themselves. Wow, what good! Those who respond then receive a notification that the person offered is a minor. "If they want to continue making an appointment, then we have their data and that can be useful for the police."He refers to a similar approach as the loverboy approach. So let's see what that approach looks like. This is what the Trouw reported on this 29 August 2016:

The team only works on sites that already facilitate sexual contacts with minors. It is emphatically not the intention to lure the innocent by the proactive approach, which can even be punishable. The approach is based on the experiences of Terre des Hommes in the Philippines. There, Sweetie, a chat robot with the appearance of a ten-year-old girl, lured a thousand perpetrators into the trap and eventually six people were actually convicted.

...

Corinne Dettmeijer-Vermeulen, National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings and Sexual Violence against Children, calls it an initiative of Terre des Hommes 'interesting, as long as it is done within the lines of the law'. "Trafficking in human beings is actually modern slavery and that is a problem of society as a whole." Dettmeijer has confidence in the method of Terre des Hommes. "Of course it is not the intention to start a manhunt, but in consultation with the competent authorities it is an interesting project."

In particular, the way in which the status of perpetrators is tackled is viewed by the National Rapporteur as a good development. "Loverboys seem to have a certain sturdiness. That is now reversed. They say very clearly "you are just a pedosexual" ", says Dettmeijer.

Okay, let's take a look at the brakes, because both the video and the article in the Trouw are bursting with subliminal programming. To begin with, the impression is created that there is a taboo. No, there is sexual abuse and the category is somewhat weakened by Terre des Hommes into a sort of market for minors and elderly people who actually want to have sex with each other, but where the ban or 'taboo' leads to undesirable situations. Corinne Dettmeijer stated in the Trouw article: "Of course it is not the intention to start a manhunt, but in consultation with the competent authorities it is an interesting project."I think Jimmy Savile also worked with competent authorities, but I do not want to keep that link all the time. What it seems to be all about is that potential perpetrators have to be cooled down a bit. Terre des Hommes will trigger them with lok-advertisements and then they will be notified that they are dealing with a minor. Which image is created unconsciously? Right: minors feel taboo on their sexual need or orientation and there is a market of older men who would actually want to have sex with minors. Terre des Homes maps out this need and tries to pamper the men with that sexual preference. In this way the predatory behavior of sexual abusers such as Jimmy Savile, and the buyers of suppliers of people like Robert M. and Mark Dutroux is weakened to a sexual preference that at most exceeds the legal limit.

What kind of image does Terre des Hommes know with this "great approach"? The sexual abuse of children is mainly due to the taboo, but the need among young people under the 16 is quite normal en that the need among older men for these younger gays is also normal. "Ah, and if we just channel that a bit, it's all pretty bad."And the people who have this need are just 'pedosexual'; you can not do anything about that. "That is a feeling, you can not explain that", Hans Teeuwen would say. And with that, gradually a kind of understanding seems to be bred for this "sexual preference" (which just floats a bit on the border). Are we here witnessing a propagandistic role of Terre des Hommes in emancipation (read: was from acceptance toprevalence) of 'pedophilia' or 'pedosexuality' (incorrect names for 'sexual abuse predator behavior')?

If you do not want to accept this emancipation process, you may "struggle with the zeitgeist". Priest Atoine Bodar also suffered from this. Antoine Bodar gives in this Volkskrant article (2011) again how he wrestled.

Antoine Bodar is the fleshed platonic schizophrenia. A few months ago he said that he wanted to do penance for child abuse by going into prison. But of course he did not, that was more so to speak. You have to see that as a conceptional act, just as you also have conceptional art.

According to Bodar, pedophilia lasted perfectly in the spirit of the age thirty years ago. Senator Brongersma could then easily tell about it. Gerard Reve was still thundering with small young boys (read it again), while Tigger was on the watch, as we learn from the biography of Nop Maas. Bodar understood the spirit of the times, banished his homosexuality and became a priest.

In my view what Terre des Homes is pretending to do here is nothing more than a propaganda show to give their donors the impression that they are doing a good job, while they are actually performing a covert acceptance show, in which sex with minors from the punishable corner must be massaged and to a category must be marginalized from something that is a consequence of an age limit problem and taboos. For example, we must quickly forget that there are people like Jimmy Savile and other celebrities in the British elite (not in the Netherlands, of course) who are targeting very young children.

For example, we seem to have forgotten that Marc Dutroux was probably only a small pivot in a large network and we seem to have to forget that people like Robert M. used very young children (and even babies) for abuse films and abuse by third parties. Sexual abuse of very young children is a beastly inclination. Jimmy Savile has proven that there are lines with the highest circles. Terre des Hommes seems to play a secret role in the further shift of the age and acceptance limit and completely ignores the real problems. But we Dutch people may just like wipes for bleeding. Even though we know that the church is bugging us; we will still put money in the collection bag. Even though we know that the state is ordering us; we still pay good tax and walk to the ballot box. So this cloth for the bleeding fits well with the 'cloak of love' coat rack where we like to hang our coat.

What I am most annoyed about in this whole Terra des Hommes (imo) propaganda show is the fact that there are lure ads placed between advertisements where children are offered. "Should I shake you awake?”

The fact that there are advertisements in which children are offered should be immediately dealt with by the police and judiciary. What are 'lok-advertisements'? We can each e-mail, every call, each bityou and byteyou analyze through the big data streams, but we are not able to detect sites where sexual abuse is offered? We are unable to trace and lock up the advertisers? No, that is not possible. There are still people with typewriters behind a dusty desk with geraniums at the AIVD and the judiciary. Moreover, they are too busy with returning jihadists. Terre des Hommes should not place advertisements between sexual abuse advertisements; she would have to file a complaint as soon as she finds such advertisements and should focus on the real problems. This appearance of infiltration seems mainly to promote gradual acceptance. Gideon van Aartsen is therefore looking for child abuse ad sites and sees the whole day of everything passing and the only thing he can do is there are ads between places and then give the responders a mild warning? Imagine! Suppose there were websites where advertisements were placed along the lines of 'jihadists offered'; Would not we try to immediately find those jihadists? Or would we put an advertisement in the hope that Abu al-Baghdadi might respond personally and then warn him that he would be better off recruiting elsewhere? It is your purest course!

Placing advertisements between sex abuse ads leaves the supply side untouched and contributes to maintaining the problem. So you do not bother to trace the providers of children (who are probably in the abuse circuit) and leave their ads and websites completely untouched! In fact, you just stand between them. If you are able to detect such websites and detect such advertisements, you should immediately use your connections with the police and the courts to deal with the providers. Terre des Hommes apparently does nothing on the supply side and only tries to appease the customers with a warning. Sorry, but my nose is getting a lot more itching.