Home  

Joint Mission Report Bucharest - Brasov - REQUEST FOR ACCESS OF DOCUMENTS

Joint Mission Report Bucharest - Brasov

 

Arun Dohle November 14, 2024

Delivered

Dear Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations,

The Paradoxical Development of Liberal Governance: International Adoption Policy and Professional Social Work in Authoritarian South Korea, 1953–1976

Abstract

This article explores the development of international adoption policy in post-liberation South Korea, emphasizing the roles of American and Korean professional social workers. By analyzing the orphan registry and a pivotal international adoption law, it reveals how international adoption in South Korea presents a unique opportunity to observe the formation of modern social policy in a newly liberated nation during the Cold War. The study argues that adoption policy served as a crucial locus of transnational governance, where American and Korean social workers pursued their liberal ideals of professional social work within the context of the authoritarian policies of the South Korean state. However, their quest for scientific professionalism, standardized procedures, and public oversight led to a paradoxical evolution of adoption policy, diverging sharply from the trajectory seen in Western liberal democracies where social work significantly contributed to the consolidation and expansion of the welfare state. In South Korea, embedded transnationality and ideological mismatch resulted in the state’s further withdrawal and the creation of policy workarounds that undermined the core social work principle of the child’s best interests. This case highlights the complexities and blurred moral boundaries in the shaping of modern governance and the broader journey toward modernity under postcolonial, Cold War conditions.

Issue Section:Article

“Everything began with the registry when a child was taken in for international adoption,” recounted Kim Kwang-su, a retired social worker in his eighties, as we sat in a café in central Seoul in 2017.1 He shared his experiences of handling adoption paperwork in 1970s South Korea, after I inquired about the typical adoption procedures of that time.2 In South Korea, the family registry (hojŏk) served as the foundational document for identification and citizenship until its abolition in 2008.3 This system, however, was not originally developed by Koreans. At the turn of the twentieth century, amidst imperial competition and expansion, the Korean peninsula fell under Japanese colonial rule, and the Japanese introduced the family registry system in 1909 in an early effort to make the Korean population legible to the colonial state. Unlike birth certificates or other typical forms of identity in Western societies that assign legal status to individuals, the family registry system conferred this status on the family as a unit. In particular, emphasizing the patrilineal principle, it required all individuals to be registered under the name of the family’s male head either as his spouse or child. Through their inclusion in this patrilineal system, individuals obtained official identification. When Korea was liberated in 1945 and two separate governments were subsequently established in the North and South during the intensifying Cold War divide, the South Korean government chose to retain the official role of the family registry.4

For children placed in overseas adoptions, however, a special variant known as the “orphan registry (koa hojŏk)” was used.5 Unlike the family registry where a child is listed under the father’s household, the orphan registry designated the child as the head of a single-person household, leaving blank all familial information such as details about the parents (see Figure 1). Social worker Kim elaborated that this registry was one of the first documents used to facilitate international adoption. Containing minimal information about the child, usually just an assumed date of birth and a name assigned by social workers, and seen as inconsequential, necessary paperwork, this document has long been overlooked outside the adoption profession.

Government urged to ease guidelines on adopting children

Adoptive parents and advocates have  called upon  government to ease the stringent adoption regulations that they say are preventing many vulnerable children from finding homes.

 

They urge policymakers to revise existing adoption laws and create a system that prioritizes every child’s right to grow up in a family.

 

SENT AWAY

It didn't seem to matter what happened at the teen treatment center. The state of Utah always gave it another chance. Death. Allegations of abuse. Criminal charges. Bizarre punishments. Whistleblowers coming forward. Each time, the place got a pass.

A team of reporters from three news organizations has spent the last year digging into the untold stories of Utah's massive teen treatment industry. Some 20,000 teenagers facing depression, delinquency and other problems have been sent there from every state in the country over the last six years. Sent Away investigates how the government failed to keep all those kids safe — through the voices and stories of the teens who lived it.

Havenwood Academy

Havenwood Academy (2014-present) Cedar City, UT

Residential Treatment Center

History and Background Information

Havenwood Academy (also called Havenwood South) is a HOPE Group behavior-modification program that opened in 2014. It is marketed as a Residential Treatment Center for teenaged girls ages 12-18 with a history of “early complex childhood trauma and attachment related issues including Reactive Attachment Disorder”. The average length of stay is reported to be around 12 months. Havenwood has been a NATSAP member since 2016.

The address given for the program is 246 E Fiddlers Canyon Rd, Cedar City, UT 84721. However, they recently purchased a 160-acre plot of land which was formerly a historic cattle ranch, and are in the process of converting this into their primary location. This ranch is located at 8097 W 2000 S, Cedar City, UT 84720.

The Hope Group - Our Team

Our Team

Hope Group

kenhuey

CEO

Ken Huey

Son reunites with mother decades after being placed for adoption

A sweet reunion took place recently for Vamarr Hunter and his mother Lenore Lindsey, who placed him for adoption shortly after giving birth to him decades earlier.

“It’s the most joyful story and time in my life,” said Lindsey, “In my senior years, all of this has come together.”

Lindsey was just 17 years old when she gave birth to Hunter, and he was 35 when he learned he was adopted. Years later, he decided to search for his mother and underwent genetic testing, according to ABC 7. He learned that his birth mother lived in the same South Shore Chicago neighborhood that he did and that he was a regular customer at the bakery she owned, Give Me Some Sugah. He said the experience “further strengthens my faith.”

After connecting with his birth mother, he was also able to meet the sister he never knew he had as well as an entire extended family he didn’t know for most of his life. Hunter has four children of his own, all living in the same neighborhood as their grandmother without realizing it.

“When I called him, that connection was so immediate,” Lindsey said. “I can’t even explain it. It was just like everything in my heart just broke open.”

Aiden welcomes baby sister: Anupama and Ajith celebrate birth of their second child

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Anupama and Ajith, the couple who previously made headlines with a high-profile adoption controversy, have welcome second child, a baby girl. Ajith shared the news on social media, expressing joy over the arrival of their daughter. The family, including their elder popular on YouTube and other social media platforms, where they regularly share videos with a significant viewer base. 

The couple gained national attention when Anupama accused her parents of putting her first child up for adoption without her consent. This alleg sparked a political storm, drawing in the CPM, the Kerala government and the Child Welfare Committee (CWC). Anupama’s legal battle to regain c son became a prominent media story, shedding light on child adoption policies and procedural lapses. 

In the initial stages of the controversy, Anupama’s parents handed the child over to the CWC, who arranged a temporary adoption with a couple f Pradesh. However, once the story became public, the adoption was halted. Following a court-supervised DNA test that confirmed Anupama’s pare Andhra couple returned the child to her and Ajith.

Catherine Meyer, Baroness Meyer - Wikipedia

Catherine Irene Jacqueline Meyer, Baroness Meyer,[1] CBE (née Laylle; born 26 January 1953), is a British politician and businesswoman. She is the widow of Sir Christopher Meyer, the British former Ambassador to the United States. In 1999, she founded the charity PACT, now Action Against Abduction. In October 2020, she was appointed as the Prime Minister's Trade Envoy to Ukraine.[2]

Background

[edit]

Meyer was privately educated at the French Lycée in London, the School of Slavonic and East European Studies and the London School of Economics. She began her career in financial services and became a licensed commodity broker in 1979, working for Merrill Lynch, Dean Witter and E.F. Hutton.

Biography and child advocacy

Graduation research into abuses in the intercountry adoption chain

With the entry into force of the revised European Directive on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings ((EU) 2024/1712), illegal adoption has been identified as a new form of human trafficking. The directive does not explain under which circumstances illegal adoption falls under exploitation. In view of the future amendment of the law in the Netherlands, a graduation research was conducted at the EMM on abuses in the intercountry adoption chain and the impact of these abuses on victims.

 


Interviews with victims

In the graduation research, fifteen victims of abuses in the adoption chain were interviewed. Their adoptions took place between 1975 and 2001. The now adult adopted respondents came across illegal and unethical practices during their search for their adoption history. In the interviews, they tell what they discovered about the events preceding their adoption procedure and the course of the procedure.

Types of abuse