Home  

Looking Back Ten Years-What has Changed in International AdoptionLand?

Looking Back Ten Years-What has Changed in International AdoptionLand?

By on 12-21-2011 in Adoption Preparation, PNPIC, PostAdoption Resources

For fifteen years (1993-2008), there was a very helpful organization formed by adoptive parents called Parent Network            for the Post Institutionalized Child (PNPIC). Almost ten years ago, they published the following piece. We ask: What has changed for the better?

“THE PAST:

In July 1991, Thais Tepper and Lois Hannon both  adopted children from Romania through Cradle of Hope. Ironically, we  were both in Romania at the exact same time, but we did not connect  until 1993 when a mutual friend put us in touch with each other. We had  had no help from our agency once the checks cleared, and we did not know  then that the behaviors we were seeing in our children were actually  well documented. Our first conversation lasted a good while – and we  realized that our children had very similar problems, but we had no idea  what to do, where to go, the types of  doctors or therapists we needed to find or even what to call the  problems. Remember, that was way back in 1993, the internet was not the  norm, and talking about “problems” of adopted children was not what  other adoptive parents wanted us to do (unless, of course, you happened  to have a child with problems). We were often highly criticized for our  efforts to help those kids who weren’t “perfect”. Our only goal was, and  still is, to help the children who have been adopted.

We  began to do some research, and we talked to everyone and anyone who  would listen. We ended up accumulated vast amounts of information, and  word quickly spread. We were spending vast amounts of time talking to  families, photocopying and mailing huge packages of information to  everyone who wanted it. About that time, we were briefly joined by two  other mothers, and decided that the best way to gather and disseminate  information was to form an actual network – thus the  beginning (tho with a different name at first) of The Parent Network  For The Post-Institutionalized Child (PNPIC).
We were very  fortunate to meet some wonderful parents, doctors and therapists who  worked closely with us to understand the problems of the deprivation,  neglect and abuse of the internationally adopted child, and to give what  we learned to families unprepared, as we were, and desperate for help  with their children.
We are really proud of all we have done.  We published a newsletter for 6 years; we published a book; we have  connected many of the medical doctors who now specialize in this field;  we have been involved (on-screen and off-screen) in many television and  radio shows as well as newspaper and magazine articles; and we have  developed and presented over 25 conferences throughout the country and  overseas. We have talked with thousands of families, and now that email  is the norm, have connected with countless families  via our website and email.
We have done all this out of the  kindness of our hearts, and concern for the children. We have never  received any payment for what we do. Of course, we encounter some  expense in keeping the network alive, and those expenses are covered by  the sale of our newsletters and book, and by donations.
THE PRESENT:
As  we are part of the sandwich generation, we have had to deal not only  with our children, but with our aging parents as well. The needs of our  families had to come first. With the advent of the vast information on  the internet, we decided to suspend publishing the newsletter although  we remain active with the issues of internationally adopted children,  our website, emails and phone calls. We have worked with other groups  just now beginning to deal with the issues of this population. We are in  the development stage of some conferences, and have also begun to work  on our next book.
The phone  calls and emails we have received over the last year or two are rather  disturbing. We find that families who have recently adopted continue to  be ill prepared for international adoption; we find that families who  contacted us back in our infancy, who thought they had children without  problems, are now asking us about disruption and residential facilities,  and there are families who call to tell us how wonderful everything is,  but…(and its usually a BIG but). Adoptive families often don’t realize  that many problems will not be recognized until the children are older,  and are shocked when the kids “hit the wall”.
We recognize  that many adoptive and preadoptive parents seem to come down with an  illness called “denial”. Too bad. The kids suffer.
THE FUTURE:  While we wish there would not be a continued need for what we do,  history has shown that there will be. We will continue to try to find  new avenues to explore, to promote long term  studies and to find help anywhere we can. As our children get older, we  know we will be facing a new set of problems, just as other parents  are. We will do what we can to put what we learn into the public forum  so others won’t have to struggle as we have had to.
AS WE LOOK BACK:
we  are saddened to say that little has changed. The adoption industry  thrives, and many in it are making huge sums of money on this product we  call internationally adopted children. The children and adoptive  families suffer, because they are often not fully informed about the  potential problems that are inherent with this population (or they  refuse to believe it could happen to them); families are not prepared to  deal with the behavior, medical and emotional problems that their  children exhibit, and they are not prepared – emotionally and  financially – for children with lifelong problems.
We are  still waiting for the adoption industry to take some  responsibility. They are quick to tout the positives of adoption, but  few really openly disclose the potential problems prior to adoption or  offer support, help and resources after the adoption. We can’t  understand why this huge group, with tremendous resources, can’t pull  together some programs to help struggling families. Respite alone would  probably eliminate many disruptions and divorces. We are two moms just  trying to help the kids – and look what we’ve accomplished! Imagine if  there were honesty and accountability from the adoption industry – it  would benefit everyone, especially the children.
We would like  to acknowledge the tremendous support from the many doctors and  therapists who have been available for us over the years. We are  sincerely appreciative and grateful for their generosity in donating  their time and talents to write articles, speak at conferences and talk  to families at no cost. We hope that their interest in our  population will provide some solid research and resources for the  future.”

Italiaadozioni.it, il nuovo sito dedicato a chi vuole adottare

Italiaadozioni.it, il nuovo sito dedicato a chi vuole adottare

12/12/2011 BY DARIA DOMENICI LEAVE A COMMENT

“L’utilità del portale è quella di dare più informazioni possibili a chi a vario titolo incontra l’adozione. Abbiamo pensato infatti, che non solo i genitori, ma ad esempio anche i pediatri o gli insegnanti, così importanti per i nostri figli, possono trovare nel sito un primo aiuto.” Così Maurizio Mazzoni, responsabile di www.italiaadozioni.it, spiega come è nata l’esigenza di riunire tutte le voci sull’adozione in un unico sito.

ItaliaAdozioni, che nasce grazie alla collaborazione di un gruppo di persone che hanno in comune la passione e l’attenzione per il mondo dell’adozione, punta molto sul passaparola: oltre a commentare le notizie del blog, i visitatori sono anche invitati a fornire contributi e pareri.

Oltre a informazioni utili per chi intraprende il percorso dell’adozione, il sito affronta le questioni legali (con una raccolta di leggi e sentenza in materia), quelle mediche, psicologiche, quelle relative al percorso di inserimento del bambino in famiglia e a scuola.

SOCIAL WORKERS 'SEX UP ABUSE CLAIMS TO SNATCH CHILDREN FOR ADOPTION'

UK NEWS
SOCIAL WORKERS 'SEX UP ABUSE CLAIMS TO SNATCH CHILDREN FOR ADOPTION'
Story Image


The whistleblower said auth­orities’ worries of another Baby P had created a climate of fear

Sunday December 11,2011
By Ted Jeory

Comment Speech Bubble Have your say(32)

SOCIAL workers are regularly “sexing up” dossiers on problem parents to remove children into care and even to farm them out for adoption, a whistleblower reveals today.

The experienced social worker told a Sunday  Express investigation that council managers are frequently putting pressure on  him and colleagues to rewrite reports considered “too positive”.

They are  demanding “more dirt” on mothers and fathers to increase the chances of  securing court orders that place their children into care and which boost  councils’ Ofsted ratings.

The whistleblower said the worry of having  another Baby P on an authority’s hands had created a climate of fear that was  destroying innocent families.

The findings were last night described as a  “national scandal” by one MP who is now demanding a full Parliamentary inquiry  into Britain’s child protection system.

ì
We’re being pressured to go against what we think is right for families
î

The whistleblower

Lib Dem John Hemming will raise the  issue when he appears at the Education Select Committee on Tuesday.

The  committee’s chairman, Graham Stuart, has indicated he would talk to our  whistleblower in confidence.

The whistlebower said the behaviour of social  workers has been dramatically and “needlessly” changed since the full details  over the 2007 death of Baby Peter Connelly in Haringey, north London, emerged  three years ago.

He said there is now a new culture of fear in which the  buck of responsibility is continuously passed up the managerial chain.

SEARCH UK NEWS for:

 

He  said people in desperate need of help with their parenting skills are instead  having their lives ruined by bureaucrats who fear being blamed for a highly  unlikely case of extreme abuse.

Courts sitting away from the public glare  are then increasingly being asked to make life-changing decisions based on  “biased” evidence, he claimed.

Latest figures show that social workers,  already overstretched due to Government cuts, are dealing with rapidly rising  caseloads with 42,700 children now on child protection plans.

Social  workers say this is largely due to political pressure after the Baby P  case.

David Cameron has said there are too many children in care and that  the adoption process needs streamlining, but critics say the real issue is  about why so many youngsters are taken into care in the first place.

The  whistleblower, a father who works for a large authority in the south of  England, said: “We’re being pressured to go against what we think is right  for families.

“Personally, I’ve written reports and been told, ‘You are too  positive with this family, we’ll never get it to court unless you make it more  negative’.

“I’ve actually been told that.

“Although it goes against  what you feel is right, you feel under an obligation.

“Children need to be  in their families and we need to support them as much as possible and only if  there are great risks do you take a child out of a family.”

When asked for  an example, he said: “In order to get a child through to a child protection  conference, we’re told to make the situation look bad and worse than it  actually is.

“We don’t necessarily make things up, but we can change the  emphasis.

“It’s subtle. I had one child aged about eight. I’d prepared a  report with the emphasis saying that the parents were prepared to make changes  and that their attitude was willing.

“But then I was told this was too  positive, we’d never get it through.

“I was told to bring out more of the  negative points, so I had to concentrate on the lack of cleanliness of the  house. That put the parents in a bad light.”

He said these reports were  used to take children out of a family home and in many cases then placed for  adoption.

He added: “It destroys families. But the newer, younger social  workers see this as the norm, they just want to toe the line with their bosses  and that’s worrying.”

The whistleblower also  raised serious concerns about council-appointed psychologists who he believes  are biased in favour of their paymasters.

In particular, he said he had  doubts over what he said were nebulous concepts of emotional abuse and  “attachment theories”.

He said: “These psychologists create such a high  standard of for parenting that most of us would fail.”

MP John Hemming said: “I congratulate the Sunday Express in  unearthing this national scandal.

“A number of whilstleblowers  have come to me to explain how expert evidence is at times sexed up and at  other times plainly wrong in the Family Courts.

“Taking the  wrong children into care on the basis of sexed up dossiers and meaningless  psychobabble results in other children being left to die such as Baby P.

“Parliament must act to sort out the child protection system.”

Nishra  Mansuri, of the British Association of Social Workers, recognised the  whistleblower’s comments and said: “It’s a major concern. The cuts are  creating so much pressure for social workers that the right decisions are not  being taken.

“We’re storing up so many problems, but the odds are against  us.”

 

Russia may impose moratorium on child adoption for US

Russia may impose moratorium on child adoption for US
Posted: Sun Dec 11 2011, 16:50 hrs Moscow:

Gandhigiri - By nairAre annaji's methods... - By SAWho is he to give ce... - By sathyapal nairAre annaji's methods... - By SATushar is playing wi... - By AnilMr - By Prakash PSupport india for re... - By Anil
Anna: Parallel govt dangerousFight against terror and PakKasab’s birthday How safe is knee replacement?

Russia's ombudsman for child rights, Pavel Astakhov, said on Saturday he did not rule out that a moratorium for adoption of Russian children by U.S. citizens may be imposed.

“It is not ruled out that after the joint activities with the Prosecutor-General's office, the Foreign Ministry and the Education Ministry we will propose to impose a temporary moratorium on adoption of our children and their transportation to America until the concluded agreement is ratified,” he said after the meeting with Prosecutor-General Yuri Chaika.

The United States “demonstrates inability to fulfil its obligations to our children who are taken to America,” he said.

According to the most modest estimates, around 100,000 Russian children have already been adopted by American parents.

EIGHT ETHIOPIAN CHILDREN DIE AT AN ORPHANAGE

EIGHT ETHIOPIAN CHILDREN DIE AT AN ORPHANAGE | News

By Abrham Yohannes on December 10, 2011

1 Vote

EIGHT ETHIOPIAN CHILDREN DIE AT AN ORPHANAGE | Source: The Reporter.

Three of the children were adopted by American citizens

Editor Dares Dutch Crook and wife!

General News of Thursday, 8 December 2011

Source: Benjamin Tawiah

Editor Dares Dutch Crook and wife!





Editor Dares Dutch Crook and wife!

General News of Thursday, 8 December 2011

Source: Benjamin Tawiah

Editor Dares Dutch Crook and wife!





European Expert Group stimulates transformation of care services in Europe

European Expert Group stimulates transformation of care services in Europe

Following her meeting with members of the European Expert Group on Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care (EEG) in Brussels on 6 December 2012, High Commissioner Pillay has sent letters in support of such a transition to all EU Member States.

“The support of the High Commissioner is of critical importance for us,” says Luk Zelderloo, the Secretary-General of the European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities (EASPD), which shares the rotating chairmanship of the group with Eurochild and OHCHR. “We need to bring the way in which national and European funds are spent in line with the States’ and EU’s obligations stemming from the Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities – particularly its article 19, which lays down the right to independent living.” Members of the European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care with High Commissioner Navi Pillay © Sverker Ågren, ENIL

“Instead of investing into institutional care, as many States did in the previous period, they should stimulate the development of support services in the community, such as personal assistance, family support services, housing adaptations and assistive technologies, all of which facilitate independent living and inclusion in the community,” adds Ines Buli?, the main author of the Common European Guidelines and Toolkit on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care. The creation and publication of the Guidelines and Toolkit were supported by the European Commission, firstly through a joint foreword by two Commissioners, but also financially by providing translations of the documents into several languages.

Mária Herczog, a member of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and President of Eurochild, emphasizes that States should also use their resources to further the enjoyment of the rights of the child in line with the Committee’s jurisprudence. She points to the importance of the 2009 UN Guidelines on the Alternative Care of Children as a major source of inspiration: “In many European countries, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, many children are still placed in institutions due to poverty or disability. But the UN Guidelines lay down that poverty should not be a reason for placement into alternative care, let alone into institutions. What these countries need is support for families in difficulties and, in those cases where separation from parents is really in the child’s best interest, the development of family-type care.”

European Expert Group stimulates transformation of care services in Europe

European Expert Group stimulates transformation of care services in Europe

Following her meeting with members of the European Expert Group on Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care (EEG) in Brussels on 6 December 2012, High Commissioner Pillay has sent letters in support of such a transition to all EU Member States.

“The support of the High Commissioner is of critical importance for us,” says Luk Zelderloo, the Secretary-General of the European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities (EASPD), which shares the rotating chairmanship of the group with Eurochild and OHCHR. “We need to bring the way in which national and European funds are spent in line with the States’ and EU’s obligations stemming from the Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities – particularly its article 19, which lays down the right to independent living.” Members of the European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care with High Commissioner Navi Pillay © Sverker Ågren, ENIL

“Instead of investing into institutional care, as many States did in the previous period, they should stimulate the development of support services in the community, such as personal assistance, family support services, housing adaptations and assistive technologies, all of which facilitate independent living and inclusion in the community,” adds Ines Buli?, the main author of the Common European Guidelines and Toolkit on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care. The creation and publication of the Guidelines and Toolkit were supported by the European Commission, firstly through a joint foreword by two Commissioners, but also financially by providing translations of the documents into several languages.

Mária Herczog, a member of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and President of Eurochild, emphasizes that States should also use their resources to further the enjoyment of the rights of the child in line with the Committee’s jurisprudence. She points to the importance of the 2009 UN Guidelines on the Alternative Care of Children as a major source of inspiration: “In many European countries, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, many children are still placed in institutions due to poverty or disability. But the UN Guidelines lay down that poverty should not be a reason for placement into alternative care, let alone into institutions. What these countries need is support for families in difficulties and, in those cases where separation from parents is really in the child’s best interest, the development of family-type care.”

Report on Ethiopia delegation – December 2011

Report on Ethiopia delegation – December 2011

Officers from this Department travelled to Ethiopia from 24 October until 6 November 2011 to assess the ongoing ethics and viability of the Program under the new Program arrangements; investigate how the Program is operating in practice; and strengthen relationships with key Ethiopian Government Departments and Authorities.

Some aspects of the program are operating well. Other aspects of the program continue to present challenges.

Australia Program Office

The delegation visited the Australia Program Office, which has been operational for over 6 months, and met with all Australia Program staff. It was clear that the Australian Representative, Woz Lemlem Fesseha, and her team have been working very hard to match families with children referred to the Program, manage their adoption cases though the various Ethiopian authorities, research potential partner orphanages and assist with post adoption searching. We would like to acknowledge their very hard work and passionate dedication to assisting Australian families.