Home  

Blog - Dutch Adoption NAS

6 maart

De dag dat we afscheid moeten nemen van het geboorteland van Lorgens. Het geeft ons een dubbel gevoel. We halen een kind weg uit zijn eigen land, cultuur, geur, kleur en gewoontes. Dat voelt wreed. Het andere gevoel is, gelukkig we halen Lorgens weg uit een omgeving waar hij relatief weinig kansen heeft om een bestaan op te bouwen die niet per definitie gepaard zal gaan met honger, strijd om te blijven bestaan, dreiging op straat en wantrouwen.

Om kort na 9.00 uur stond Franck al voor de deur. Veel te vroeg! Hij zal nog een vrachtje gecharterd hebben en had gehoopt dat wij al klaar zouden staan. Niets was minder waar. We moesten nog een deel inpakken en de rekeningen betalen. Dus uiteindelijk vertrokken we na afscheid te hebben genomen van Niels en Marianne, om kort na 9.30 uur naar het vliegveld. Het vliegtuig zou rond 13.00 vertrekken dus we hadden nog ruim de tijd om rond te hangen op dat vliegveld.

Een vlot vertrek naar Miami en een goede vlucht. Beide jongens waren van verveling in slaap gevallen gedurende de twee uur durende vlucht.

De planning was dat we ongeveer 4 uur wachttijd zouden hebben op vliegveld Miami voordat we verder konden. Die tijd hadden we ook wel nodig zeg! De douanecontrole was verschrikkelijk. Helaas geen voordeel omdat we kinderen bij ons hadden. Nee nu was het een nádeel dat we kinderen bij ons hadden. Hoe hou je dat volk een beetje in toom tijdens de file? Mijn God wat een drama. Aan alles komt een eind dus aan deze sessie ook. Eerst even een frisse neus gehaald en toen lekker eten op het vliegveld. Zo verstreek de tijd langzaam maar zeker naar het tijdstip van vertrek. Mooi het was 19.15 uur we mochten gaan boarden.

Wikileaks - adoption fraud - Madagacar

Illegal adoption, a problem identified in 2004, is no longer

considered a threat in Madagascar. With the revision of the 2007 law

to regulate adoption procedures, there have only been several cases

seen through the legal system this year, and no judgments have taken

place to date. The punishment for committing an illegal adoption,

Newsletter GLA

Dear Dixie, Stephanie, the staff at GLA and FLASH,

I am writing this letter to thank you all for Carmelina – a wonderful perfect match for our family and just before our permit ran out.

I had personally given up hoping for a match. Miriam (at the agency Flash in The Netherlands) and I exchanged emails in January as I asked about a possible extension of our permit. Miriam responded that an extension was not possible without a match. I understood and left the matter there. Of course you cannot produce children out of thin air and we had kept up with the adoption process challenges in Haiti through the newsletters so knew the situation was getting more difficult.

So I was not looking forward to my 46th birthday - which was just 6 days away - when all doors for adoptions would be closed just because of my age. (The Netherlands has a rule that once you reach 46 years old, you can no longer adopt a child.) Then we received the life-changing phone call from Miriam. It was just after 6:00pm and I had come in from work and was peeling potatoes. My husband, Cees, was not in yet and our son Chistiaan was playing piano in the background, so it was hard to hear. When Miriam said who she was, I froze. Flash has never called us before.

Miriam very kindly did not keep me in suspense and told me right away that they had a match for us. I could not believe it. I don’t know what I said – I was speechless. I was so surprised, shocked in fact. I was totally not expecting it. The only thing I could think was that it was now too late to get our permit extended – the Ministry of Justice would never do this in 6 days. But then Miriam said it was already extended. Until 2011!!! I could not believe my ears. It was already extended. Whoopeee….

Please give me the names of adoption agencies in australia?

sadeemsh...

Please give me the names of adoption agencies in

australia?

please give me the names of adoption agencies which are working in australia and

helping the adoptives familis to adopt a children internationally. Thank you

'Veel kinderen vinden nooit de weg naar huis terug'

'Veel kinderen vinden nooit de weg naar huis terug'

door Geert van der Star. vrijdag 27 februari 2009 | 03:40

Tekstgrootte

SINT-MICHIELSGESTEL - "Een vluchtelingenstroom is een bron van wandelende chaos. Duizenden mensen die achter elkaar door en langs elkaar heen sjokken, elkaar opzij duwen, zo snel mogelijk weg willen van de verschrikkingen achter hen.

Een moeder of vader die een zoon of dochter uit het oog verliest, is hem of haar kwijt. Het kind wordt opgeslokt en meegesleept door de vluchtelingenstroom. Het sluit zich aan bij het enorme leger van wezen. Dat zijn geen incidenten: iedere dag weer raken tientallen kinderen in Congo hun ouders op die manier kwijt."

LA ADOPCIÓN EN EL PERÚ

Google Translation:

ADOPTION IN PERU

February 26, 2009 -- Send to a friend

Adoption is the act of providing a beautiful home that respects the rights and integrity of a child by a court on condition of abandonment. It is certainly a very important decision that establishes a strong legal and emotional bond with the child. It is not simply to give a child a family. Adoption is an encounter between a child in need and parents in their desire.

According to statistics, in 2007, of the 251 adoptions granted in Peru, 144 were made to persons resident abroad. The adoption process in Peru, which is free and does not require a lawyer, has an average waiting time of 4 years after being declared "fit" the adopter. The reason is that while we know that in Peru there are many children who are homeless or living in inadequate housing, the declaration of child or adolescent in condition or state of neglect for the judiciary, which is known to have an abundant legal burden .

Letter Spidla to members Expert Group

-----Original Message-----

From: EC ARES NOREPLY [mailto:DIGIT-NOREPLYARES@ec.europa.eu]

Sent: Donnerstag, 19. März 2015 12:13

To: DOHLE Arun

Subject: Ares(2015)1213269 - Reply - Your request for access to document (Expert Group on Transition from Institutional to Community Based Care (2)) --- GESTDEM 2015/1141 --- Attribution DG EMPL

UAI: Parliament is facing a historical error

delvaux@senators.senate.be, schelfhout@senators.senate.be , info@kindengezin.be , Vera.Jans@vlaamsparlement.be


 
Belgium Parliament is facing a historical error
As everybody should know by now, secrecy, hidden facts and sealed records is against the interests of adoptees and most of the cases against the long term interests of mothers also. But without examining and doing research about the effects of secrecy regarding adoption, the Belgium Parliament is heading towards a situation of going back to earlier times to make an historical error.
Without understanding why, the Belgium Parliament is willing to accept a new bill to put a new regime on delivering babies for the adoption industry in secrecy. As all know, involved in the adoption world, sealed records and secrecy regarding relinquishment does not deal with the fact of the long term consequence of adoptees wanting to find their parents.
Historical research shows even, that in many cases, the woman whom relinquished the children for adoption wants to children to know where and who they are. This fact seems not to be taken into account. Again it seems that the adoption community of adopters see their interests protected but for which price ?
 
We cannot remember that so called birth mothers relinquished their babies to give these children as a secret gift to others nor to these children to be delivered in secrecy.
 
Why the Belgium government still wants to pull off this new bill is for many people, at least for (domestic) adoptees and many (former) birth mothers a question. But with all the adoption scandals where Belgium lately is involved, this question is not longer a strange one but answers again, that the interest of (prospective) adoption parents is more important as the ones where we should listen to. Adoptees and their (birth)parents.
 
As a member of the International Hague Convention regarding adoption, Belgium is not alone neglecting the guidelines of this convention but also pleads with a decision to enforce the new bill, not to respect article 21 b and c of the Child Rights Convention. It is strange that the international community, at least the European Union, is not criticising Belgium Policy regarding adoption. Probably awaiting the implementation so they can do the same.
 
At the end, one has to understand that the demand for children is unequally high and the supply of these wanted children every year less and less. To fulfill the wishes of the electorate, politics have to be involved to please and to protect the interest of the (prospective) adoption parents. Many of them are members of parliament themselves. It is not e very difficult answer to find why secrecy and sealed records should be introduced again. The question still remains, in whose interest this decision will be made.
 
United Adoptees International

Minister Frattini meets with foreign minister of Belarus Sergei Martynov

Minister Frattini meets with foreign minister of Belarus Sergei Martynov
Rome 24 February 2009

Minister for Foreign Affairs Franco Frattini met today with Belarus foreign minister Sergei Martynov.

 Their conversation focused on bilateral topics concerning both the economy and culture, and also touched on visas for medical treatment and adoptions.

With regard to relations between the European Union and Belarus, the meeting offered an opportunity for Minister Frattini to encourage Minsk in its open attitude toward Europe and to confirm Italy’s consensus with Brussels’ approach to the Belarus government. Minister Martynov expressed his appreciation for the active and positive role that Italy has played thus far in fostering his country’s integration into the European Union.

At the end of the meeting the two ministers signed a Memorandum of Understanding on continuing consultation between foreign ministers on matters of common interest.