Home  

Le système français de l'adoption internationale, jugé "défaillant" par le président de la Cour des Comptes Philippe Séguin

Par Mathieu DESLANDES

Pour leJDD.fr

>>Des organismes inefficaces, des tarifs opaques, des transferts de fonds suspects... Mercredi prochain, lors de la présentation du rapport annuel de la Cour des comptes, les critiques vont s'abattre sur le système d'adoption internationale, jugé "défaillant" par le président de la Cour, Philippe Séguin. Une quarantaine d'associations françaises sont concernées.

Philippe Seguin fait un sort au système d'adoption. (Maxppp)

Philippe Seguin fait un sort au système d'adoption. (Maxppp)

ETHIOPIA ADOPTION PROGRAM UPDATE – FEBRUARY, 2009

ETHIOPIA ADOPTION PROGRAM UPDATE – FEBRUARY, 2009

Lynn and I just returned home from spending eight wonderful days with our staff in Ethiopia. We met with government officials, orphanage staff, foster home staff, and U.S. Embassy officials. We also met with officials from Ethiopian Airlines and three major hotels in Addis. In addition, we escorted two beautiful children from their foster homes to their adoptive family in Dallas, Texas.

We currently have 27 adoptions in progress in Ethiopia. Twelve will be finalized with the next two months. Our Ethiopian staff set a goal of assisting a minimum of 70 orphaned children to be placed with wonderful families in the United States through West Sands Adoptions in 2009! Our goal is to more than double that number in 2010. We are all committed to accomplishing this goal. In addition, WSA is in the process of establishing a Free Medical Clinic in Ethiopia.

We have worked hard to streamline the adoption process and keep the cost of adopting as low as possible. Please contact us at asacredmission@gmail.com, 435-313-6323 or toll-free at 866-677-3077 for: 1) A list of the step by step procedures in adopting from Ethiopia, and 2) Our current fee schedule. We will be more than happy to personally answer any questions you may have.

*Government policy (MOWA) allows single women to adopt from Ethiopia. Please note that the difference between the age of the adoptive mother and adoptive children should not exceed 40 years. For example, if an adoptive mother is age 55, she can adopt children 15 years of age or older.

Forum: Discussion on Mussie/Bethezatha/CHSFS



Avatar / Picture

Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 358
     10/02/09 at 08:52 AM #1

Hi all,
I haven't posted on here in quite awhile. We are one of the "oldie" families... my husband and I brought our son Ben (Bekalu) home from ET through CHSFS back in Feb. 2006 (he was five then... just turned nine!!!) 

The reason for my post is that my husband and I just (two weeks ago) adopted a baby boy, who was adopted from Ethiopia and then disrupted by his first adoptive family because of him having severe special needs that they were not made aware of or were prepared for. (The first adoptive family did not adopt through CHSFS or with AAI, who I work for).

Our Noah Biruk is an absolute joy and we are having SO much fun having a baby again!!

Anyway, on his initial referral paperwork, it states that he was born in Hadero Tunto and was first in an orphanage down south that is just abbreviated as BCHA. I believe this stands for Bethzatha Children's Home Association.

I found reference to this orphanage in one post on the forum, and I was curious if anyone has any info about this place at all? Anyone know where it is exactly? Anyone have pictures? We would be grateful for any info you might have.

Thanks!!


__________________
Best,
Erin

Adoption Coordinator for HIV+ children for Adoption Advocates International

Happy, blessed mom to 12! 

http://fullhousehandshearts.typepad.com
MLadopts
Registered: 11/13/07
Posts: 835
     10/02/09 at 10:31 AM #2

Erin, congratulations on your new addition! How very exciting for you!

Tunto is a village maybe some 30 km west/northwest of the town of Hadero (look for the maps that Jonathan and Tony, I think, have posted here... you'll sort of see Hadero on, IIRC, a pink road heading east-west... continue west to Tunto). It's on the road to Mudulla--a graded road, accessible from the Addis-Hossana road.

Alas, it is a really food-insecure area. MSF had a feeding center in Tunto last summer and has some really hard to take images of the need there. This USAID report for the current season also singles out Hadero Tunto as one of the most troubled spots right now: 
http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADO393.pdf

Bethzatha is a former name of the orphanage in Hossana that CHSFS funds at least in part, and where, it seems, the overwhelming majority of CHSFS children are from. It is now called Mussie. When I was in Hossana, absolutely nobody knew of an orphanage called Bethzatha, though they were all familiar with CHSFS and understood Mussey to equal CHSFS. 

Bethzatha is, however, a common name and could also refer to a totally different orphanage. If it is, in fact, the CHSFS orphanage in Hossana, there are pictures of the exterior floating around blogs somewhere. In summer of 08, they stoppped allowing adoptive parents to enter the interior for reasons I find completely unconvincing, but CHSFS families still visit the exterior. If you go to Hossana, it wouldn't be hard to find.
 
__________________
ML 
First-time parent
Dossier accepted 11/9/07
Referral 10/7/08
Court approval 12/16/08
Birth certificate 12/29/08
Travel 1/22/09
Bessrny
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 02/12/07
Posts: 1,660
     10/02/09 at 11:31 AM #3

EDIT: SEE "EDIT" AT END OF POST PLEASE.

I could have sworn -- no, I am quite sure -- that the care center we visited in Hosanna (before going on to the CHSFS office/HQ in Hosanna, for the birth-family meetings) was called Bethzatha. Am I wrong? We weren't allowed pix, but there was a coffee tree in the small front yard, at the right; there were clotheslines strung in the yard; there were small unlighted rooms with cribs and babies in pairs in them; and, at the right immediately after coming in the front door, there was a larger unlighted and unfurnished room with babies and toddlers in various states of distress and grief and hunger crawling all around a mat of the floor with their care takers.

This was June, 2008.

Does anyone else remember being inside Bethzatha?

I'm fairly convinced my memory of the name is correct because I know for sure that I spent a long time googling the name, and came up, eventually, with a hospital in Addis with the same name: Bethzatha. (And at the time of our trip I tried to figure out if there was a connection between the Addis Bethzatha hospital and the place I'd seen in Hosanna. And, in fact, I recall someone -- correctly or incorrectly -- told me that, yes, Bethzatha was an Ethiopian organization that partially funded the place we saw in Hosanna.)

EDIT: yes, I just checked my notes from the trip, and the Hosanna orphanage/care center we visited in june, 2008, was DEFINITELY called Bathzantha. now, whether or not this is physically the same structure as what is now called "Mussie" in Hosanna, I have no idea....

__________________
Bess 
East Hampton, NY
Referral: 3/5/08 
NETTIE TESFANESH, baby girl, 8 months old
Court date: MADE IT! April 22
Travel Date: May 29th
Home: June 6th, 2008
OFFICIALLY WAITING AGAIN: APRIL 21, 2009
Bessrny
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 02/12/07
Posts: 1,660
     10/02/09 at 11:43 AM #4

PS: This was a VERY meaningful part of the journey for me, seeing the children in distress, as ours would have been when first coming into care. Very different from meeting the babies in Addis -- after they'd been fed for months, and been under doctors' care for months. I'm sorry to hear parents no longer get the opportunity. And I'm really sorry there has been no explanation of why. (Could it be for disease prevention? Could it be for legal reasons? If there's a good reason, we should be told that reason. Even if the reason is a seemingly "bad" one -- like, they don't want to upset Western parents, or they don't want us to see the conditions there -- i would very much like to hear that reason.) 
__________________
Bess 
East Hampton, NY
Referral: 3/5/08 
NETTIE TESFANESH, baby girl, 8 months old
Court date: MADE IT! April 22
Travel Date: May 29th
Home: June 6th, 2008
OFFICIALLY WAITING AGAIN: APRIL 21, 2009
melanie
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 12/06/05
Posts: 2,388
     10/02/09 at 12:21 PM #5

Yes, this is the orphanage that we visited one year ago. Sept of '08. We were one of the last groups allowed inside though no pics were allowed. I belive one of the reasons families were no longer allowed to go inside is that families were "reporting back" how many babies, children etc were in care at the present time. I fully admit I was one of those parents. How can you not??? I don't see what the fuss was all about. But what do I know???.....
It is sooooooo sad to me that they don't allow families inside anymore. Perhaps there are other reasons. I hope so because seeing this place was very important to me. both of my children were cared for here. It is part of their story, part of their history...As their mama, I needed to see it...
melanie
 
__________________
Melanie
wife to John 
Sam (7), Drew (5) and Owen (4--home 2-4-06). Referral on May 28th 2008 after waiting 
8 months and 8 days for sweet Tesfanesh Faith-6.5 weeks old (now 18 months old)
praying and wondering and thinking about blessing #5......
Court date-July 7th...made it!!
travel sept 10th 2008...
"God doesn't call the qualified, He qualifies the called"
MLadopts
Registered: 11/13/07
Posts: 835
     10/02/09 at 12:23 PM #6

Bess, when I asked, we were given two reasons they stopped allowing visits like yours: (1) it is disruptive of the routine for the children; and (2) after some visits in summer 2008, when people were doing the "where are referrals" posts, some people posted that they had seen some children, x number of children, something like that in Bethzatha. So what? CHSFS says that people then called them saying, "I hear there are kids in Hossana, so does that mean referrals are along the way?". Again, I say, so what? Yet CHSFS thought the best response to these calls was NOT the very obvious and easy answer of, "No, not necessarily. Other people may adopt from that orphanage, or those children may or may not be of the age and health range that you are seeking; it's not a direct pipeline. Sorry, but we still don't have any more information on when the next batch will be." Rather, their response was to say "no more visits". 

To my mind there is absolutely nothing wrong with mentioning the numbers of children there, or the conditions. If some PAPs misuse that information and get their hopes up, that's their problem. 

As to the first rationale, that it is disruptive, that would hold more water. However, given the conditions you describe; and the fact that these are not classrooms where a lesson is being taught, or isolation wards; and that adults routinely see or look at children who are not legally theirs; that it's at most a small number of families for a few minutes each week; and that we didn't hear anything about it being disruptive until the incidents above; well, I just don't buy it. 

I think the real reason is to draw a veil over either the conditions there, or the process. Others could draw different conclusions.
 
__________________
ML 
First-time parent
Dossier accepted 11/9/07
Referral 10/7/08
Court approval 12/16/08
Birth certificate 12/29/08
Travel 1/22/09
africamom
Registered: 04/16/09
Posts: 192
     10/02/09 at 01:12 PM #7

I, like Bess, found this part of the trip to be very moving and important. I am sorry to hear that it has been discontinued, and disappointed to hear the supposed reasons. 

I'm attaching photos I took of this center. And, yes, I took photos inside, which I was not supposed to do, but my understanding was that the ban against indoor pictures was to prevent photos being taken of children--you'll notice there are no children in my photos. I'm even more inclined to post them, now that future travelers are unlikely to see inside...

 
Attached Files:
jpeg HosannaOrphanage1.jpg (298.23 KB, 133 views)
jpeg HosannaOrphanage3.jpg (174.12 KB, 126 views)
jpeg HosannaOrphanage4.jpg (188.98 KB, 124 views)
jpeg HosannaOrphanage6.jpg (493.41 KB, 112 views)
jpeg HosannaOrphanage7.jpg (404.86 KB, 105 views)
jpeg HosannaOrphanage8.jpg (365.30 KB, 106 views)
supermomerin9
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 358
     10/02/09 at 01:20 PM #8

Thanks so much everybody! I have found that Bethzatha is a very common name in Ethiopia (and many variations on spelling, etc.) although it seems likely that this is where our Noah Biruk was (he was in an orphanage down south... his paperwork says 7-8 hours from Addis... with the initials BCHA). He was there from Feb. until April 2009. He was not adopted through CHSFS though, so I wonder if other agencies are getting children from there as well? 

Anyway, I could not come up with any other orphanage with those initials or anything even similar, so I think it must be it.

Thanks again... especially for the pictures. :)
 
__________________
Best,
Erin

Adoption Coordinator for HIV+ children for Adoption Advocates International

Happy, blessed mom to 12! 

http://fullhousehandshearts.typepad.com
Bessrny
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 02/12/07
Posts: 1,660
     10/02/09 at 02:02 PM #9

It's very interesting, hearing the stated reasons for the ban on parental visits. 

I actually, after I posted, thought about it some more -- and thought I could see a valid reason for not allowing groups of adoptive parents in. But this doesn't seem to be the reason given.

Pondering this, I recall that some of the babies and toddlers we saw were, frankly, in states of shock and grief. Some of them -- when we entered, and tried to comfort them, or play with them, or gently re-assure them -- very appropriately responded with howls of fear and alarm. I mean, here they are. Some (all?) have just lost their family. Many are ill, some are malnourished. And these troupes of giant scary white people are tromping in.... Ya know?

It occurs to me that if there were a US non-profit caring for traumatized babies and toddlers, they certainly wouldn't let troupes of strangers in, in big bunches.

Of course, given the circumstances -- international adoption, and all the issues of transparency, etc -- there ARE other concerns to balance against such a concern as the one above. (Would the importance of transparency outweigh some of the fears of upsetting children further?)

But... hmmm.... it doesn't sound like this is one of the explanations given by CHSFS, anyway. Unless.... this is the "disruption" they're talking about? Trying to ease traumatized kids into a scary new life -- horrible, really, without parents -- and the appearance of strangers, however friendly, is a "disruption"?

Hmm.

Ponder.
 
__________________
Bess 
East Hampton, NY
Referral: 3/5/08 
NETTIE TESFANESH, baby girl, 8 months old
Court date: MADE IT! April 22
Travel Date: May 29th
Home: June 6th, 2008
OFFICIALLY WAITING AGAIN: APRIL 21, 2009
SusanJohnson
Registered: 12/14/05
Posts: 1,078
     10/02/09 at 02:18 PM #10

Hi Erin,

Indeed the Bethanza orphanage was housing children for various adoption agencies. I think that was one of the reasons CHSFS was upset about people saying 'there are 20 babies at the Bethanza orphange' because not all of the children were going to the CHSFS care center. I asked about the process when I was there and I was told that the child would go to whichever agency the birth family had approached. If birth family went to the CHSFS office to relinquish their child than that child would be transferred to the the care center for Children's home, but I was told there were other agency offices in the town of Mudulla.

I was allowed to tour the orphanage - it was sad and meager, but I am so thankful that I had the opportunity to meet my sons nanny's. All I had to do was say my son's name and they were hugging me and saying how much they loved him!!! It is too bad they took that opportunity away from families.
 
__________________
Susan and Chuck
T(19), B(16), C(13), M 3 1/2(Et-home 12/06),S 2 1/2(Et-home 8/8/08), paperchasing for our 8 year old Ethiopian dauhter - other agency
cndmom
Registered: 06/15/08
Posts: 375
     10/02/09 at 02:29 PM #11

"I asked about the process when I was there and I was told that the child would go to whichever agency the birth family had approached. If birth family went to the CHSFS office to relinquish their child than that child would be transferred to the the care center for Children's home, but I was told there were other agency offices in the town of Mudulla"

Does this mean that it is now legal to relinquish a child directly to an adoption agency? Birth families no longer have to go through an orphanage?

Terri
SusanJohnson
Registered: 12/14/05
Posts: 1,078
     10/02/09 at 02:44 PM #12

(I'm sorry for the confusion I am speaking about what happened in 2008!)I have no idea how the process actually works now. The impression that I got when I was there in 2008 was that when the children came into the orphanage they already knew which facility they would be transferring to. I think it is a new law that children cannot be relinquished directly to Adoption agencies. Isn't that why the children are now not being transferred as quickly to the Children's Home run facility? 
__________________
Susan and Chuck
T(19), B(16), C(13), M 3 1/2(Et-home 12/06),S 2 1/2(Et-home 8/8/08), paperchasing for our 8 year old Ethiopian dauhter - other agency
cndmom
Registered: 06/15/08
Posts: 375
     10/02/09 at 02:53 PM #13

I thought it was always the case that it was illegal to relinquish a child directly to an agency. My understanding of the new law was that children had to stay in the orphanage until they had passed court and then go to the children's home, not as soon as they were referred as it was before. From my understanding of that law, that is why children are taking longer to be transferred to the children's home.

I thought that is why all our children's paperwork comes from an orphanage, because all relinquishments had to be to them. Aren't orphanages supposed to be responsible for investigating the cases to ensure that the paperwork is right? I thought that was the way it has always been, which is why I was surprised to hear the birth families were reliquishing directly to an agency.

Terri
Kim
Registered: 12/06/05
Posts: 641
     10/02/09 at 03:03 PM #14

Erin, congratulations! I peeked on your blog, and your son is so cute. Those little cheeks! 
__________________
Kim
Charlottesville, Virginia
Son, B., born in Lemu, Ethiopia 12-20-2003
Home 9-9-2006
Bessrny
Avatar / Picture

Registered: 02/12/07
Posts: 1,660
     10/02/09 at 04:08 PM #15

Erin: Bingo!! I found a business card, among my notes, from a fellow named Samuel Getahun, the general manager of Bethzatha Children's Home Association. I have his phone, email, mailing address. (I can only vaguely recall meeting him. Altho the address on the card is in Addis, I think we actually did meet him in Hosanna. I might be mistaken, but.... a youngish fellow, well-spoken, who showed us around.) . If you want the details, I can give them to you, if you PM me?

PS: Clearly your BCHA is indeed the organization that was at that time running CHSFS's Bethzatha. (Aka, now "Mussie." And... under whose jurisdiction? CHSFS's directly? Confused.)
 
__________________
Bess 
East Hampton, NY
Referral: 3/5/08 
NETTIE TESFANESH, baby girl, 8 months old
Court date: MADE IT! April 22
Travel Date: May 29th
Home: June 6th, 2008
OFFICIALLY WAITING AGAIN: APRIL 21, 2009

What Happens To the Children?

January 28, 2009. What Happens To the Children? International Adoption ended in Romania five years ago. Periodically we look at what has happened to the lives of children whose birth parents cannot take care of them. This week we learned one answer. According to the Romanian newspaper, Gandul, there has been an overwhelming number of abandonments in Bacau county. In the previous three weeks, more than 140 children have been abandoned but the Child Protective Services of the county could only take 44 of them. (Indeed it only had money and space for 20). According to Sorin Brasoveanu, director of CPS Bacau County, "We are being confronted with an avalanche of abandonments. It's regrettable that it's happening. I think the problem exists because local communities have not gotten sufficiently involve. We have no more room in placement centers and we have room for maybe two children under age two. In all the placement centers, we have only 30% of the personnel help that we need. At this moment, it is impossible to even take one child in an emergency placement." This situation should never have existed in the first place.

L'ancien journaliste sera le chef de file du Nouveau centre pour les élections européennes de juin prochain en Ile-de-France.

Monde 28.01.2009 | 19:00

Réagir à l'article

Cavada fait son come-back

L'ancien journaliste sera le chef de file du Nouveau centre pour les élections européennes de juin prochain en Ile-de-France.

Jean-Marie Cavada revient. Le président du Nouveau Centre Hervé Morin a annoncé, mercredi 28 janvier, que l'ancien journaliste sera le chef de file de la formation centriste pour les élections européennes de juin prochain en Ile-de-France.

List of agencies with missing Russian post placement reports

.

"20/20" Vision Less than Acute: Media Perpetuate Myths About Child Mental Health

"20/20" Vision Less than Acute: Media Perpetuate Myths About Child Mental Health

Swift

Written by Jean Mercer

Sunday, 25 January 2009 00:00

The ABC program 20/20 did the public no service in its recent myopic support of pseudoscience. Aired in late November, 2008, the presentation "The Toughest Call" emphasized common "alternative" approaches to adoption issues, rather than citing excellent empirical research from investigators such as Sir Michael Rutter. "The Toughest Call" (Nov. 28, 2008, Parts 1-5; http://abcnews.go.com/2020) encouraged the public to accept myths about adoption, including the idea that adopted children have many unpredictable mental health risks. The program suggested that the children they discussed were cases of Reactive Attachment Disorder, a legitimate diagnosis-- but in fact the symptoms described were not those conventionally considered for diagnosis of this disorder, but another, more frightening set of behaviors advertised by the cult-like "Attachment Therapy" community.

Take more children into care, says Barnardo's chief Martin Narey

Take more children into care, says Barnardo's chief Martin Narey

The head of the charity Barnardo's has provoked a new debate over problem families with a controversial call to take more children into care.

Writing in The Sunday Telegraph, Martin Narey said that social workers should remove more, not fewer, children from their natural parents.

He admitted many professionals would regard his views as "heresy", and criticised the prevailing philosophy of social services departments which, he claimed, sought to keep families together wherever possible.

His call comes amid widespread public concern over how problem families should be tackled, in the wake of the Baby P scandal and the debate over "broken Britain".

His remarks divided social workers and politicians. The Conservatives welcomed the call for more intervention, but family justice campaigners said that any such change would lead to more children being removed without good cause.

Mr Narey also said that once the decision had been made to take a child away from their family, there should be greater use of residential care – formerly known as children's homes – as an alternative to placing challenging children with a succession of foster families.

He said: "The emphasis is – too much in my view – on fixing families."

Describing a case dealt with by Barnardo's, where children with rotten teeth and poor school attendance had been removed from their "scandalously neglectful" family and had begun to improve in foster care, Mr Narey said: "The whole direction of statutory and voluntary sector effort, it seemed to me, was directed to seeing whether this family could be fixed.

"In time, that would probably involve the children returning to a home which might, if not immediately, once again descend into inadequacy and neglect. Why would we want to take that risk?"

Referring to Baby P and Shannon Matthews, he went on: "Long before the revelations around these two children I have wondered whether we need fundamentally to reassess our approach to care and to residential care in particular."

Mr Narey, a former director general of the Prison Service who left government to run Barnardo's in 2005, said local councils and charities tended to regard placing a child in care as "the worst possible choice for any child", particularly if the youngster was heading for a residential home rather than foster care.

He called for a fresh look at the way children's homes are set up and financed. "It cannot be beyond us to provide high quality residential care," he said. "Indeed – to add to my heresies in this paper – I have seen such care provided in the UK by the private sector."

Welcoming the remarks, Michael Gove, the shadow children's secretary, said: "I think after Baby P a change is now going on, where people do realise that the interests of the child are paramount. It is not good enough to leave children in circumstances, with the birth parents, where that child could be at risk of abuse.

"Foster parents do a fantastic job but we do need to look seriously at other care options. I am not saying that residential care is the right answer in all circumstances, but we do need to give consideration to improving it because we cannot leave children like Baby P in places where they face significant risks."

However, John Hemming, the Liberal Democrat MP and chairman of Justice for Families, pointed to data from the Department for Children, Schools and Families which showed that among 7,800 children taken into care in 2006, only 1,800 had been returned to their families by March 2007.

"I'm not sure Mr Narey really understands what is going on. Nor am I sure that he has the practical experience," said Mr Hemming.

"His basic assertion that more children need to be taken into care and fewer need to be returned to their families ignores the statistics."

Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of the union for family court staff, Napo, disagreed with Mr Narey's suggestion that more children should be taken into residential care.

"Barnardo's have a vested interest in residential homes because they run some of them," he said. "All the evidence suggests residential care should be used as little as possible because the experience is damaging."

Baby P, who was 17 months old, died in August 2007 after suffering more than 50 injuries while living with his mother, 27, her boyfriend, 32, and their lodger Jason Owen, 36, despite being on the "at risk" register and receiving 60 visits from health and social workers.

Karen Matthews, the mother of Shannon, was jailed for eight years last week along with the child's uncle Michael Donovan for kidnapping the youngster, then aged nine, for £50,000 in reward money, raising further questions about the way the family had been handled by social workers.

Wes Cuell, director of children's services at the NSPCC, broadly agreed with Mr Narey's assessment.

He said: "We should not be keeping children out of care just because we don't like what care represents.

"If children need to be in care, they should be, and we should find the right sort of care for them which is not based on traditional beliefs about care based in families.

Ian Johnston, chief executive of the British Association of Social Workers, said: "Martin is right to say that we need to look at things differently. I would like to think that most social workers will look at all the possibilities."

French authorities visit Haiti

Actualités

Haïti (22.01.09)

Une mission conduite par l’Ambassadeur chargé de l’adoption internationale s’est rendue en Haïti du 4 au 9 janvier. La délégation comprenait une fonctionnaire du Ministère des Affaires Étrangères et Européennes (Secrétariat Général de l’adoption internationale), une représentante de l’Agence Française de l’Adoption, deux directrices d’organisations françaises agréées pour l’adoption internationale (OAA), Médecins du Monde et Chemin vers l’Enfant, et la co-présidente d’une association de parents adoptifs (Mouvement pour l’Adoption Sans Frontières).

La délégation a pu rencontrer les interlocuteurs haïtiens de haut niveau concernés, dont le Premier Ministre, le Ministre de la Justice et le Ministre de l’Intérieur, des membres du Parlement, des hauts fonctionnaires et le Commissaire du Gouvernement (Procureur). Des entretiens avec la responsable locale de l’UNICEF et des représentants des Ambassades des Etats Unis, d’Espagne, du Canada et de Suisse ont permis de confronter les points de vue sur la situation actuelle de l’adoption en Haïti.

La mission a visité six crèches dont plusieurs sont partenaires des organismes français habilités.