Srinagar: The High Court of J&K and Ladakh on Tuesday held that the Legally Free Certificates for adoption of babies issued by Child Welfare Committee (CWC) Srinagar dissolved on August 24 last year are legally valid.   

“… it is clarified that Legally Free Certificate of the babies issued by CWC, Srinagar dissolved on August 2022, are legally valid having been issued by the CWC, Srinagar, which is continuing pursuant to the interim directions passed by learned Single Judge dated 06.09.2022 in WP(C) no 1748/2022,” a division bench of Justice Sanjeev Kumar and justice Puneet Gupta said.    

However, the bench made it clear that apart from this direction it did not express its opinion on the merits of any other matter in connection with the adoption of the babies by the applicants.

Applicants, Dhyanesh Bhatt and Vaibhavi Kulkarni had approached the court seeking clarification with regard to validity of Legally Free Certificate issued by CWC for adoption of babies on January 24 this year.

Vi?inel B?lan, the vice-president of the National Authority for the Protection of Children's Rights and Adoption, was dismissed from his position today by the Prime Minister of Romania, Nicolae Ciuc?, at ??the proposal of the Ministry of Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities. Sources say that the dismissal is based on the interview given to Olteanu Cosmin for Ziare.com , where he brought to light a series of systemic and structural problems of the child protection system, but also the limitation of some rights, such as access to correspondence and petitions. Nicolae Gorunescu was appointed in his place.VI?INEL B?LAN, former beneficiary of the child protection system from Bac?u is also a university assistant since October 2020 at the National School of Political and Administrative Studies and was the president of the Institutionalized Youth Council. He obtained the 2017 Award in the field of civic activism and human rights at the National Gala of Volunteers organized by the VOLUM Federation, being one of those nominated by Forbes 30 under 30 2017 edition. At 31 years old, he managed to become a doctoral student at the doctoral school in within the Bucharest National School of Political and Administrative Sciences, SOCIOLOGY specialization. He has degrees in law and theater, and managed to do a master's degree in criminal science and social work. Thus he, from the child rights NGO environment,social services and the directions of social assistance and child protection.AdsIn a post on Facebook , from today, March 28, 2023, he published a photo with the Decision regarding the release of Mr. Vi?inel-Costel Balan from the position of vice president, with the rank of undersecretary of state, of the National Authority for the Protection of Child Rights and Adoption. No. 69 / March 27, 2023 . At the same time, yesterday, March 27, 2023, the Official Gazette published the Decision regarding the appointment of Mr. Nicolae-Gabriel Gorunescu as vice-president, with the rank of undersecretary of state, of the National Authority for the Protection of Children's Rights and Adoption. No. 70 / March 27, 2023 .AdsVi?inel B?lan's activity was inconvenient for the child protection system, which stood out for its involvement in some of the most serious problems: child suicide, abandonment, their neuropsychiatry, but also the corruption that is so present in the protection system, things what seems to have been hidden by the leadership of the Authority, who slowly but surely isolated him and cut off his access and rights to exercise his function. Elena Tudor was one of the most adamant characters against Vi?inel's reforms and especially in total disagreement on topics such as adoption by LGBTQ+ couples, international adoption or even direct adoption, sensitive and taboo topics for the Romanian social construct.The interview granted to Ziare.com granted to Mr. Olteanu Cosmin was the straw that filled the cup and which also determined his revocation from office. Several organizations today submitted requests in the context of his dismissal to the Ministry of the Family to find out the reasons that led to this action of the Ministry, after the latter considered him suitable to lead alongside Elena Tudor ANPDCA.AdsPeople's reaction was not long in coming, and only 24 minutes after the post was published, the first reactions appeared:Felicia H??d??ean, a user of the social network writes that "In Romania, villainy defeats humanity." . Another user expressed his regret by commenting on the post "All the inconvenient people are removed, you have bothered telling and fighting for the truth and if there is no general reform it will be woeful and bitter for all who are fair and honest in this country (as many as are left)! Unspeakable regret, but I followed you and marveled at your courage and willingness to fight with your bare hands for the ideal of the afflicted of this nation. Rarely are such people born and trained, whose wings are clipped before flight. Pity!".AdsPop Crina, along with over 50 other people, claims that "Shame on them. Only in Romania is this possible. People who could do good things for us are removed. Shame on them."Until the time of publishing this article, the Ministry of Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities and the Government of Romania have not published any opinion related to this topic. It remains a mystery what the Address of the Ministry of Family, Youth and Equal Opportunities with no. 3602 of March 22, 2023, which is the basis of his dismissal and which was not published, but only mentioned in the revocation decision.Disclaimer: Article being updated. The situation is an exhaustive narrative of the source person and is being updated. This does not train the opinion of the Editor or the journalist, the role of the press being to inform the public, to be a platform for citizens' expression and to be the watchdog of democracy.Law 190 of 2018, in Article 7, states that journalistic activity is exempt from some provisions of the GDPR Regulation, if a balance is maintained between freedom of expression and the protection of personal data.AdsThe information in this article is of public interest and is obtained from open public sourcesOlteanu Cosmin is a journalist with 5 years of experience in the press, collaborator of Ziare.com and editor of the ROPAGANISM Editorial Office and the Medium Platform. He covers topics such as Politics, Human Rights, Cults and Current Affairs. Cosmin is also a theologian, entrepreneur, Romanian activist against discrimination based on religion and the founder of THE NEW PAGAN DAWN Association. He is a student at the Faculty of Roman Catholic Theology and at the Faculty of Law of Bioterra University in Bucharest .{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","url":"https:\/\/ziare.com\/visinel-balan\/visinel-balan-a-fost-demis-abuziv-din-functia-de-vicepresedinte-al-anpdca-interviul-cu-cosmin-pentru-ziare-com-a-deranjat-1796504","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Ziare.Com","logo":"https:\/\/ziare.com\/external\/templates\/default\/img\/header\/logo-ziare-com2.svg","url":"https:\/\/ziare.com\/"},"headline":"Vi\u0219inel B\u0103lan a fost demis abuziv din func\u021bia de vicepre\u0219edinte al ANPDCA. Interviul pentru Ziare.com a...","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/ziare.com\/social\/stiri-sociale\/","articleBody":"Vi\u0219inel B\u0103lan, vicepre\u0219edintele Autorit\u0103\u021bii Na\u021bionale pentru Protec\u021bia Drepturilor Copilului \u0219i Adop\u021bie a fost revocat ast\u0103zi din func\u021bie de prim-ministrul Rom\u00e2niei, Nicolae Ciuc\u0103 la propunerea Ministerului Familiei, Tineretului \u0219i Egalit\u0103\u021bii de \u0218anse. Surse afirm\u0103 c\u0103 demiterea are la baz\u0103 interviul acordat lui Olteanu Cosmin pentru Ziare.com, unde acesta a adus la lumin\u0103 o serie de probleme sistemice \u0219i structurale ale sistemului de protec\u021bie a copilului, dar \u0219i limitarea unor drepturi, precum accesul la coresponden\u021b\u0103 \u0219i peti\u021biile. \u00cen locul acestuia a fost numit, Gorunescu Nicolae.","articleSection":"Actualitate","image":["https:\/\/tb.ziareromania.ro\/Vi--inel-B--lan-a-fost-demis-abuziv-din-func--ia-de-vicepre--edinte-al-ANPDCA--Interviul-pentru-Ziare-com-a-deranjat\/83d52568b1100ba04b\/400\/225\/2\/100\/Vi--inel-B--lan-a-fost-demis-abuziv-din-func--ia-de-vicepre--edinte-al-ANPDCA--Interviul-pentru-Ziare-com-a-deranjat.jpg"],"datePublished":"2023-03-28 12:17:20.086282","author":{"@type":"Person","url":"https:\/\/ziare.com\/autor\/olteanu-cosmin","name":"Olteanu Cosmin"}}The authors who sign the materials in the Invitations - Ziare.Com section assume full responsibility for the content. Acest text a fost copiat de pe Ziare.com Vi?inel B?lan was unfairly dismissed from the position of vice president of ANPDCA. The interview for Ziare.com was disturbing https://ziare.com/visinel-balan/visinel-balan-a-fost-demis-abuziv-din-functia-de-vicepresedinte-al-anpdca-interviul-cu-cosmin-pentru-ziare-com-a-deranjat-1796504?utm_source=Ziare.com&utm_medium=copy-paste

Tika Stern was brought to Berlin from Nepal as a baby by German parents - but not as part of an official adoption. She grew up without valid papers. Now she finally wants to live in Berlin as a recognized German. By C Rubarth and H Daehler

Tika Stern grew up in Berlin without valid papers

the 24-year-old has to travel to Nepal to clarify her identity

Adopted from abroad often search for their origin

"I'm from Berlin, my roots are here," says Tika Stern. The 24-year-old stands in her old school in Berlin-Friedrichshain in front of photos from her school days. "But on paper I'm not German."

The Supreme Court on Friday suggested that a meeting be held between the Delhi

Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) and the Union Ministry of

Women and Child Development so that a discussion could take place on the issue of

2021 amendments made to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act 2015 (JJ

Act).The Court was hearing a writ petition filed by the Delhi Commission...

Zwischenbericht z. H. des Bundesamtes für Justiz   -  Interim report e.g. H. of the Federal Office of Justice

Nigeria's Anti-Human Trafficking Agency, NAPTIP Conducts DNA Tests To Determine Biological Parents Of 20-Year-Old Woman Allegedly Stolen At Birth

Nigeria's anti-human trafficking, the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP), has conducted Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) paternity and maternity tests to determine the biological parents of a 20-year-old woman identified as Juliet, allegedly stolen from her parents at birth in Enugu.

SaharaReporters had reported that NAPTIP arrested one Mrs Mariatha Chidinma Agulanna for allegedly stealing the 20-year-old woman from her biological parents – Professor Michael and Gloria Okwudili – shortly after she was born.

It earlier reported how a twist of fate and sheer providence brought the woman to her suspected biological parents after 20 years.

Mrs Agulanna had ignored several invitations by the anti-human trafficking agency, which summoned her following a petition against her for her role in the alleged theft of the baby in a hospital in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria, two decades ago.

In an aggressive piece the director of the Center for Adoption Policy in New York, Dr. Diane B. Kunz, Esq. reacts on the dwindling numbers of children who are adopted from abroad in the United States. The numbers went down from 17,000 in 2008 to 7,000 last year. The article, published on the Center’s website (http://www.adoptionpolicy.org/...), blames the Department of State (DOS) and UNICEF and their attitude towards international adoption for the decline. Dr. Diane B. Kunz, Esq. writes: ‘When speaking at international forums such as the Fifth International Policy Conference on the African Child: Intercountry Adoption: Alternatives and Controversies (May 29-30, 2012; http://www.africanchildforum.org/...), DOS and UNICEF speak with one voice, defining international adoption as cultural genocide, a sign of national failure or as a cover for fraud.’

Who doesn’t like a fiery pen, which scribbles angrily hyperbolic allegations? I do, for sure, but ‘cultural genocide’? That is even for me a bit too wild. I asked UNICEF about this and they emailed me, that ‘this is a gross misrepresentation of UNICEF’s position on inter-country adoption’ and referred me to their position paper on the subject. UNICEF, being an international organization, formulates pretty lame and bureaucratic: ‘UNICEF supports inter-country adoption, when pursued in conformity with the standards and principles of the 1993 Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Inter-country Adoptions – already ratified by more than 80 countries.’ Not the language of anti-adoption Nazi’s I would say. It says further: ‘Inter-country adoption is among the range of stable care options.  For individual children who cannot be cared for in a family setting in their country of origin, inter-country adoption may be the best permanent solution.’ It is not poetry, I agree, but I imagine that the Department of State whether they like it or not, has to take this same international perspective.  The US is – most of the time – part of a community of countries, who try to work together and try to find solutions for problems in concert with others.

I checked that African conference where according Dr. Diane B. Kunz, Esq. UNICEF and DOS misbehaved. Well, most of the speakers were from African countries and only two sessions gave word to members of adoptee receiving, western countries. In one of them I found an American official, Ambassador Susan Jacobs, Special Advisor for Children’s Issues of the US Department of State. Would she have spoken about the ‘cultural genocide’ that international adoption would be? I didn’t ask, so to not embarrass myself.
  I didn’t see a UNICEF speaker. If UNICEF was involved it was maybe to wreak havoc in the hallways in between the sessions and to pick up the check at the end of three days in May 2012 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
 The results of the conference can be read in a report online. It is obvious that the African countries were and are collaborating to find a collective answer to the very western and very invasive solution to the problems of parentless children (or orphans) in their countries, which is international adoption.
 To suggest that the US or UNICEF instigated the following paragraphs would be rather patronizing:
  'The term "adoption" does not feature in African languages and in many African countries adoption is a concept that most people are not familiar with, which signifies the fact that intercountry adoption is a "foreign practice".’
And:
  ‘Awareness  should be  raised  throughout  the continent as to what adoption entails and that intercountry adoption should be a measure of last resort.’

The final result of the conference is formulated in a document and it is clear that Africa, other than Dr. Diane B. Kunz, Esq. wants us to believe, is just not in favor of international adoption: ‘The conference adopted the Addis Ababa Communiqué on Intercountry Adoption which calls for a reversal of the current trend of resorting to intercountry adoption as a primary solution for African children in need of alternative care. Instead, the communiqué calls for prime priority to be given to enabling all children in Africa to remain with their families and in their communities. The communiqué therefore calls upon African States, Civil Society organisations and Treaty Bodies to assume their responsibilities in ensuring the wellbeing of all children in Africa.’ I know, no poetry either.

Interestingly and surprisingly enough the document expresses Dr. Diane B. Kunz, Esq.’s position:
‘The US fully endorses intercountry adoption and does not regard it as a measure of last resort. despite the acknowledgement of the principle of subsidiarity, the main purpose of intercountry adoption is considered to be the upbringing of a child by a loving family, even when this entails the physical removal of a child from his or her family or country of origin.’ It sounds as if Dr. Diane B. Kunz, Esq. and not Ambassador Susan Jacobs was in Addis to express the American position!

Cremona – A man and woman from the Cremona area have been sentenced to three months in prison and a fine of 10,000 euros for failing to meet their duty of care and maintenance. The background to the court decision is shocking. The couple are said to have abandoned their adopted son after he was taken into his home just five days earlier.

A 26-year-old Brazilian, who was only ten years old at the time of the events, reported the case. After his adoptive parents turned their backs on him, he lived a poor life and went down the wrong path. For a series of petty thefts, he ended up in prison in Modena. "I ask no pity. I have served my just punishment. But in prison I met someone for the first time who listened to me and who explained my rights and my obligations. The only thing I received from my adoptive parents is my last name," the young man told Corriere della Sera.

Because he met the lawyer Gianluca Barbiero behind bars, who supports him as legal counsel, the Brazilian experienced justice after 16 years - now also in the second instance. The verdict on appeal came in 20221 in Brescia.

On August 30, 2007, the Cremona couple returned to Italy from Brazil with the adoption permit from the São Paulo court in their pockets. On September 4, the husband and wife decided not to adopt the child again. They claimed the ten-year-old had pointed a knife at his adoptive father.

When the Brazilian later filed a complaint, he instead claimed that his adoptive mother hit him with a belt after he argued with the couple's biological son.

What fundamental rights do adopted children have? What should you do if your child wants to meet their biological family? Find out here.

Adoption is often a way out for underage boys and girls in situations of vulnerability. Indeed, it’s an essential resource as they have the fundamental right to grow up in a family. In this article, we’ll advise you on what to do if your child is adopted and is interested in looking for their biological mother.

Due to the fact that they’re adopted, these children have another fundamental right. The right to know where they came from. However, although most parents recognize this fact, it often also generates a great deal of fear and doubts about what they should tell their children about their personal history and origins.

In fact, both adoptive families and people who are adopted need the guidance and support of various professionals. Among the specialists involved are psychologists who advise them and help them go a long way in the search for their biological relatives.

“Every single minute matters, every single child matters, and every single childhood matters.”

Synopsis

The high court while rejecting the bail plea said that that footpath dwellers are most vulnerable and marginalised section.

A single judge bench of the Bombay High Court comprising Justice Anuja Prabhudesai has recently refused bail to a man while observing that child trafficking is one of the most serious and heinous forms of exploitation which not only impacts the child and the family but threatens the very fabric of the society.

“Child trafficking is one of the most serious and heinous forms of exploitation which not only impacts the child and the family but threatens the very fabric of the society. Considering the gravity of the offense, I am not inclined to exercise the discretion under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in favour of the Applicant, who is involved in child trafficking racket”, the court observed.

The bench of Justice Anuja Prabhdessai was hearing the bail application of one Parandam Gudenti, who was arrested in connection with the sale of a 10-month-old baby belonging to a family living on a footpath in Mumbai. The case related to an incident of August 2021 when a child was kidnapped from the footpath near a traffic police booth in the suburban Bandra area of Mumbai while the family was asleep.