Home  

Adoption, toujours le grand flou

Adoption, toujours le grand flou 

Publié le samedi 19 février 2011 à 01H00

Toutes les tentatives de donner un cadre à l’adoption en Polynésie ont échoué. La pratique du don d’enfant entre familles polynésiennes et métropolitaines se poursuit sans structure, ni accompagnement. Au grand dam de toutes les parties prenantes.

Marielle et Olivier Chautard, en compagnie de leurs trois enfants Poerani, Hinanui et Vaea. “Nous avons les deux situations : adoption simple et plénière” explique le couple. “Les mamans ont choisi. Elles ont choisi plénière pour protéger les enfants d’un père biologique avec lequel il fallait couper le lien juridique. Cela ne nous pose aucun problème.”

ADELINE BRISSET

Officials examine inter-country adoption of Lao children

Officials examine inter-country adoption of Lao children

Lao government officials and representatives of international organisations learned about inter-country adoption yesterday to ensure all Lao children retain their full rights if adopted in other countries.

Professor Ket Kiettisack (centre left) and Mr Tim Schaffter (centre right) address the meeting.

Deputy Minister of Justice Professor Ket Kiettisack said the government welcomed the adoption of Lao children by people living in other countries, but it should be ensured the children have full rights after adoption.

“Adopted children should be able to visit their birth parents in their home country,” Professor Ket said at the opening ceremony of the Orientation on Inter-Country Adoption, held in Vientiane.

Sawistri, 25, searches for the truth about her adoption

Sawistri, 25, searches for the truth about her adoption

Of AGNETA TRÄGÅRDH. 2011-01-18

(Google Translation)

When 25-year Sawistri began searching for her biological parents in Thailand, she discovered quickly that there was something strange about her adoption.

- The man and woman who stood as my parents on födeseattesten had never even met each other, says Sawistri that police notified all involved in her adoption.

Parliament ratifies European Convention on Adoption of Children

Parliament ratifies European Convention on Adoption of Children

Today at 11:29 | Interfax-Ukraine

The Verkhovna Rada has ratified the European Convention on the Adoption of Children.

A total of 288 of the 418 MPs registered in the hall voted for the ratification of the document on February 15.

The convention establishes the requirements for the adoption process and lists the people whose permission must be obtained in the adoption procedure.

US Asst Secy arrives Nepal to discuss inter-country adoption

US Asst Secy arrives Nepal to discuss inter-country adoption

REPUBLICA

KATHMANDU, Feb 16: United States Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Janice Jacobs arrived in Kathmandu on Wednesday for a two-day visit.

Jacob´s visit comes a day after the US Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs Maria Otero, who arrived in Kathmandu on Sunday, wrapped her visit to Nepal.

According to a press statement issued by US Embassy in Kathmandu, the visit will primarily focus on the issue of inter-country adoption from Nepal.

Attorney, wife file amended complaint in botched international adoption case

Attorney, wife file amended complaint in botched international adoption case

2/15/2011 1:21 PM By Amelia Flood

An Edwardsville attorney and his wife have filed an amended complaint in a suit over a botched international adoption.

Madison County Associate Judge Clarence Harrison II is set to hear motions in the case at 8:30 a.m. on Feb. 18.

The new complaint filed by attorney Patrick Stufflebeam and his wife, Stacey Stufflebeam, includes 22 counts over infliction of emotional distress, fraud and respondent superior liability claims.

Delhi District Court Mr. Biswanand Changoe vs Indian Council For Child Welfare on 14 February, 2011

IN THE COURT OF SHRI RAKESH KAPOOR                        DISTRICT JUDGE-I : DELHIGUARDIANSHIP CASE No. 22/2011Unique I.D No.02401C0033642011IN THE MATTER OF:1.          Mr. Biswanand Changoe2.          Mrs. Raathna Indra Kamaansingh            Both residents of            2911 RE Nieuwerkerk a.d.lJssel            The Netherlands           Through their Attorney:            Ms. Loraine Campos            Adoption Officer,            Delhi Council for Child Welfare,            Qudsia Garden,            Civil Lines, Delhi.                                                              .... Petitioners.                         Versus1.          Indian Council for Child Welfare,            4, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg,            New Delhi - 110 002.2.          Delhi Council for Child Welfare,            Qudsia Garden,            Civil Lines, Delhi.                                                              .....Respondents.Date of institution of petition :22.01.11Date on which order was reserved :14.02.11Date of pronouncement of judgment::14.02.11 J U D G M E N T:

The case of the petitioners as disclosed in the petition is that petitioners are Dutch Nationals. They were married on 26.08.1994. Due to medical reasons, they could not have any biological child of their own. They are very fond of children. They have already adopted Miss Vaishnovi Teena from India, who is twin sister of the minor child Miss (G.P.22/2011) ( page 1 of 5) Reena and they think that Reena is a part of their family. It is stated that minor child Miss Reena was not placed with the petitioners by Church of North India, New Delhi because they wanted to wait and watch on her development. As such, the petitioners have expressed their willingness to be appointed as joint guardians of minor female child Miss Reena with permission to adopt her according to local laws of their country.

2. It is stated that minor female child namely Miss Reena (born on 17.06.2004) was relinquished/ left by her parents through a document of surrender duly signed by them in favour of Church of North India, Shishu Sangopan Griha, New Delhi on 25.06.2004. Care and custody of the said minor child was transferred to respondent no.2 institution on 04.09.2009 vide order dated 03.09.3009 passed by the Child Welfare Committee, New Delhi for placing the child in adoption. Co-ordinating Voluntary Adoption Resource Agency (CVARA) and Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) have given clearance/ no objection for inter country adoption of the child. The petitioners, through their Attorney Ms. Loraine Campos have moved the present petition under Sections 7 & 26 of the Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 praying that they be appointed as the guardians of the minor female child namely Reena and they be permitted to remove the minor child outside the jurisdiction of this court for her eventual adoption according to local laws of their country. 3- Notice of the petition was issued to the respondents and citation was also affixed on the Notice Board of the Court House. Both the respondents have filed their respective replies stating therein that they have no objection if the petition is allowed.

4- In support of the petition, Ms. Loraine Campos, Attorney of petitioners proved Power of Attorney executed by the petitioners in her favour as Ex.P1. She tendered her evidence vide affidavit Ex.PW1/A wherein she reaffirmed the averments made in the petition. She has placed & proved on record home study report as Ex.P2; employment certificates of the petitioners as Ex.P3 & P4; their Financial declaration as Ex.P5; sterility certificate as Ex.P6; declaration of their health as Ex.P7; marriage certificate as Ex.P8; sponsoring agency letter, issued by Wereldkinderen, The Netherlands as Ex.P9; photographs of the (G.P.22/2011) ( page 2 of 5) petitioner alongwith their earlier adopted child as Ex.P10; proof of naturalization of their earlier adopted child as Ex.P11; child approval as Ex.P12; declaration of willingness as Ex.P13; and progress reports of their earlier adopted child as Ex.P14.

5- Ms. Tarini Bahadur, Secretary, Delhi Council for Child Welfare, has tendered her evidence vide affidavit Ex.RW1/A. She placed and proved on record Child Study Report as Ex.R-1; Photograph of the minor as Ex.R-2; Clearance Certificate for placement of the minor child in inter-country adoption, issued by CVARA as Ex.R-3; No Objection certificate issued by CARA as Ex.R-4 and certificate of abandonment issued by Child Welfare Committee, New Delhi as Ex.R5. She testified that minor female child namely Reena was relinquished/ left by her parents through a document of surrender duly signed by them in favour of Church of North India, Shishu Sangopan Griha, New Delhi on 25.06.2004. Care and custody of the said minor child was transferred to respondent no.2 institution on 04.09.2009 vide order dated 03.09.3009 passed by the Child Welfare Committee, New Delhi for placing the child in adoption. The child was declared to be abandoned child and legally free for adoption by the Child Welfare Committee. No Indian family living in India or abroad is willing to take the minor child as the child is suffering from spasticity, cerebral palsy with myoclonic seizure disorder, autism, speech disorder and cortical blindness. She also testified that their institution has no objection if the petition is allowed. 6- I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the records carefully.

Korea still relies on international adoption

Korea still relies on international adoption

2011-02-13 18:43

Despite a falling birth rate here, many Korean children are still finding their home abroad, a report found Sunday. 

Of the total 2,439 children adopted in 2009, 1,125 were sent abroad, slightly down from 1,250 in 2008, the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs said. 

Adoptions have declined here along with the country’s falling birth rate. 

Over the past 10 years, the number of domestic adoptions has decreased from 1,726 in 1999 to 1,314 in 2009, while that of international adoptions has almost halved from 2,409 in 1999.

However, the ratio of international adoption still remains high despite the government’s efforts to encourage domestic adoption.

Korea has sent more than 200,000 children abroad since the 1950-53 Korean War. In 2009, Korea was the fourth-largest “baby-exporting country” to the United States after China, Ethiopia and Rwanda, the U.S. State Department reported. 

As reasons for hesitating to adopt a child, according to the institute, 32.1 percent of Koreans surveyed said that they are not sure whether they can love and raise the adopted child like their biological one, while 29.5 percent cited the nation’s family system based on blood ties.

Parents also pointed out financial difficulties (11.9 percent) and social prejudice toward adopted people (11.4 percent), the institute said.

Due to the still prevalent belief that a son carries on a family line, girls younger than three were most favored for adoption, while boys, older children and those with disabilities were less preferred.

Most parents who have adopted a child also said that a child’s health, gender and age were their priority to consider. 

“International adoption indicates a decline in young population, with the nation’s birth rate falling. It is a dishonor in the international community, which reflects our society’s evasion of responsibility for baby birth and child care,” said Kim Yoo-kyoung, fellow researcher and author of the report. 

“Children adopted abroad are more likely to experience identity crisis and a sense of loss. Due to various conflicts coming from the feelings, they could have difficulty adapting themselves to their adopted family, friends and community.”

Kim stressed that follow-up monitoring, which is currently conducted for six months after adoption, should be extended to cover the adolescent period of the child. She also suggested that government measures be made to help older or handicapped children find a family.

By Lee Ji-yoon (jylee@heraldm.com)

Daily News & Analysis Lila Parulekar, a victim of conspiracy: Maneka Gandhi

Animal rights activist and BJP MP, Maneka Gandhi, has expressed concern over the condition of 75-year-old Lila Parulekar, the ailing daughter of the Sakal newspaper’s founder and editor, the legendary Nanasaheb Parulekar.

Gandhi has alleged that Parulekar has become the victim of a conspiracy to swindle her of her multi-crore assets. Many of Parulekar’s close associates and well-known citizens of Pune such as Dr Kunda Patki, Chandrashekhar Hari Joshi and Manoj Oswal share this concern and have spoken on record with DNA.

Parulekar’s lawyer, Sunil Kadam, refused to meet DNA when contacted for an appointment on Thursday last.

A spinster and the sole child of Nanasaheb, Parulekar, who is suffering from secondary Parkinson’s disease among other ailments, has vast assets in her name.

Joshi and Oswal told DNA that apart from 12.2% shares in Sakal Papers Pvt Ltd, the firm founded by her parents, Parulekar owns a bungalow on 3.3 acres of ultra-prime land at 4A Queen’s Garden, Pune, six acres of land in Mahabaleshwar, a one-acre plot on Baner Road, a property in France (her late mother, Shanta was French) and Rs3 crore in the bank.

Lila Parulekar, a victim of conspiracy: Maneka Gandhi

WRITTEN BY

Rahul Chandawarkar

Sunday 13 February 2011 10:25 IST

MUST READ

Bhanu Farsan-Fire