Home  

ISS_IRC_Director_Job_Description.pdf

Job Vacancy

Established in 1924 in Geneva, Switzerland, International Social Service (ISS) is an international NGO with

ISS strives to protect, defend, and support children, families, and individuals separated as a consequence

of cross-border migration. ISS aims to ensure that respect for human rights is accorded to every individual,

especially to children.

More adoption and foster parent leave for tenured civil servants

The federal government wants to align adoption and foster parental leave for statutory officials with contract officials and the private sector. The proposal is on the agenda of the Council of Ministers on Friday, Minister of Civil Service Petra De Sutter (Groen) reports.

Tenured officials adopting a child under the age of 10 have so far been entitled to six weeks of adoption leave per parent. The maximum age of the adopted child has now been raised to 18 years, and those who adopt multiple children will receive an extra two weeks' leave.

Statutory officials who take in a foster child for a long time have not yet been entitled to foster parent leave. From this year, they will be given six weeks leave per parent for every minor foster child that they take care of for more than six months.

Finally, this year there will be an extra two weeks for both adoption and foster parent leave, to be divided among the parents. That extra leave will be progressively increased until 2027 to five extra weeks of leave.

The foster parent and adoption leave of permanently appointed civil servants is thus equated with the leave of contract workers in the federal public services and of employees in the private sector. In addition, the reform is also important for the work-life balance of civil servants, says Minister De Sutter. “Creating a home for a child, some of whom come from problematic backgrounds, requires attention and commitment from the new parents and it takes time,” she says. "We want to give that to the parents and the child too."

Ethical Challenges Remain in The World of Private Adoptions

Adoption practices continue to challenge the ethics of social workers due to myriad conflicting interests which have existed since the practice began. Dangerous informal child care arrangements in the early to mid 1900s have been replaced by a patchwork of state and federal laws, regulations and child care practices meant to serve the best interests of everyone associated with adoption, but we continue to allow for ethically concerning “wrongful” adoptions.

The transition to formal adoption practices was initiated in the early 1980s, with adoption case law establishing best legal practices for improving positive outcomes for children and families. Starting in 1981, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) followed suit by formalizing standards for child welfare with the publication of the NASW Standards for Social Work Practice in Child Protection.

adoptions

Daniel Pollack, Yeshiva University’s School of Social Work.

Over the last two decades, the NASW Code of Ethics and the child welfare practices have evolved and stronger assessment practices related to approval of adoptive parents have been established. Despite these advances, social workers have found themselves observing or being caught up in ethically challenging adoption practices that have continued to lead to unethical family disruptions and poorly implemented adoption policies, all of which have created more “wrongful adoptions” and a continued mistrust of the profession.

Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption

What to do if you think your, or your child’s, intercountry adoption was illegal or illicit

In Australia, intercountry adoptions are facilitated under the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (the Hague Convention)(link is external). This helps preserve the safety, rights and interests of children. The rights and best interest of the child are central to any decisions made about a child’s adoption.

The Australian Central Authority (ACA) and State and Territory Central Authorities (STCAs) are aware of the risks involved in intercountry adoption and only partner with countries who adhere to the Hague Convention.

If concerns or allegations about illicit and illegal adoption practices are raised we have the Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption (the Protocol). It has been developed by the ACA for intercountry adoption under the Hague Convention, in consultation with STCAs. The protocol is reviewed periodically to make sure it adheres to best practice in preventing and addressing illicit or illegal practices in intercountry adoption.

What is the Protocol?

Department says consulting firm was hired due to 'urgency' in setting up mother and baby home redress scheme

AN OUTSIDE CONSULTING firm was hired by the government to “expedite” the process of setting up a redress scheme for survivors of mother and baby homes, the Department of Children has said.

The government has hired OAK Consulting to oversee the consultation process at a cost of €20,000.

The process was launched by Children’s Minister Roderic O’Gorman last week. The closing date for receipt of written submissions is 31 March.

OAK will also facilitate a number of “consultation events with interested parties” between 22 March and 29 March. These meetings will be online due to Covid-19 restrictions.

The meetings are scheduled to last for three hours each, and attendees can bring a “support person” with them.

Only 34 children were adopted in Queensland last year

Only 34 children were adopted in Queensland over the past year – an 80 per cent plunge from the total two decades ago.

Adoptions have fallen across the state from the 170 children adopted in 1995-96.

Of the 34 children adopted in Queensland in 2019-20, 11 were adopted from overseas, according to data due to be released by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) on Wednesday.

There were 12 “local” adoptions in Queensland, where children born or permanently living in Australia had no prior contact or relationship with the adoptive parents, while 11 were “known” adoptions.

Queensland politicians are set to debate legislation, sparked by the tragic death of toddler Mason Jet Lee, that would make adoption a third option in deciding how to achieve permanency for a child, except for an Indigenous child.

Fake documents hamper Dutch-Indonesian adoptees' search for birth parents This article was published in thejakartapost.com with

Bud Wichers, a photo and video journalist from the Netherlands, has traveled the world to capture major conflicts and wars, including in Syria, Gaza, Libya and Ukraine. “I became a photographer because I believe in social justice, connecting people to make the world a better place,” he said recently. “If I weren’t adopted, those feelings might not have been so strong.” Bud was among 3,040 Indonesian children who were adopted by Dutch nationals between 1973 and 1983. While he acknowledged that his adoptive Dutch parents had given him the opportunity of a better life, he still longs to know his birth parents. For years he has attempted to retrace his roots in Jakarta. His adoption documents identify him as Budiman, born in 1977 to a couple named Rusdi and Mustiah who lived in Gang V of Jl. Dukuh Pinggir in Tanah Abang, Central Jakarta. His Dutch parents adopted him from Kasih Bunda orphanage — now Loka Kasih — on Jakarta’s outskirts in 1978. Bud has visited both places but found no substantial information. Last year on Nov. 20, he once again visited his birth parents’ supposed home address on Jl. Dukuh Pinggir, a kampung located just behind luxurious shopping malls and office towers along the Hotel Indonesia traffic circle. An elderly woman named Esni said Bud’s mother, Mustiah, had lived there but had moved to Tangerang, Banten, with her daughter several years ago. This information gave him a surge of hope – but it did not last long. Read also: Indonesian woman in Netherlands writes to long-lost biological mother in viral open letter Weeks later, Bud connected with another Indonesian adoptee in the Netherlands who had the same address on her adoption document. “She had the same address on her paper around the same time period. Only different parents’ names on the paper,” Bud said. DNA tests showed that they were not related. “I believe […] my adoption papers were doctored; I’m not sure about anything in those papers anymore,” he said. “I have no idea where to go from here," he said. Bud Wichers as a baby at the Bunda Kasih orphanage, now Loka Kasih, in Tangerang, Banten, in around 1978, just before his adoption to a Dutch couple. (Courtesy/Bud Wichers) Long-overdue apology Falsified adoption documents have become a significant hurdle for many Indonesian adoptees trying to track their roots. Ana Maria van Valen, the cofounder of the Mijn Roots Foundation, said forged documents often indicated that the adoptions were illegal. Mijn Roots has reunited 38 Indonesian adoptees with their birth parents and is helping another 87 to date. “We have found 38 mothers. Sometimes we found out that the story is not what is stated in the papers. Some mothers never gave up their babies,” Ana said. “In my case, my mother never wanted to give me up. My mother asked a lady to take care of me so she could work in Jakarta. When she came back, I was gone. But in the papers, it is stated that my mother had given her permission [for the adoption].” At the age of 18, Ana Maria van Valen (left) reunites with her mother in Bogor, West Java. Ana and Christine Verhaagen – both Indonesian adoptees in the Netherlands – cofounded the Mijn Roots Foundation in 2014 in efforts to reunite adoptees with their birth families. (Courtesy/Ana Maria van Valen) In 1983, the Indonesian government uncovered a slew of illegal adoption cases, implicating orphanages, birth clinics and midwives, and subsequently banned overseas adoptions. But in the Netherlands, it took almost four decades for the Dutch government to admit the wrongdoings. For years, adoptees from Indonesia, Colombia, Brazil and several other countries repeatedly called on the Dutch government to investigate and apologize for its problematic adoption process. The long-overdue apology finally came on Feb. 8 following a government commission’s investigation into adoptions from Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh from 1967 to 1998. The commission found that some children had been stolen or bought from their birth parents under economic pressure or false pretenses. The investigation also detailed different types of structural abuses, including Dutch officials overlooking falsified documents, fraud and corruption. The findings prompted the Dutch government to suspend adoptions from abroad. “When it comes to mistakes made in the past, adoptees should be given recognition, and they should be able to rely on our help and assistance in the present,” Legal Protection Minister Sander Dekker said in a statement in February. The Dutch government said adoptees would receive support from a national expertise center during all stages of the search for their roots, as well as sociopsychological and legal assistance. Ana and Bud welcomed this move, with Bud saying: “I believe it’s a big step in the right direction from the Dutch government. I’m grateful for that.” The Dutch government has allocated 1.2 million euro (US$1.43 million) to support adoptees from different countries, including Indonesia. “They will now give funding to organizations that support adoptees, but not for individual searching cases. We have applied for that, and the [related] ministries are still discussing this,” Ana said. “An adoptee could spend thousands of euro for tickets, accommodation, searching, mental healthcare, DNA tests and other [requirements].” Not always a happy ending At Mijn Roots, Ana and her team try their best to provide emotional support to adoptees. Ana realizes that some Indonesian adoptees face questions about their identity, which often leads to depression and other mental health problems. Ana, who was adopted at the age of 2.5 years old, also faced similar problems. “Being separated from your biological mother and losing that special [bond] can be a traumatic experience. I know some adoptees who really find it hard to cope with that,” she said. “You come from a different culture, your family has different characters. You are Indonesian in the Netherlands. But in Indonesia, you feel more Dutch.” When an adoptee finds their parents, it does not always mean a happy ending. Adoptees may find it hard to adjust to the birth family’s culture — and sometimes their unrealistic expectations. “Sometimes the family thinks that the adoptee is very rich and they ask for [financial] support,” Ana said, noting that such expectations sometimes prompted adoptees to sever ties with their birth parents. Bud knows that finding his biological parents may not lead to a fairy-tale reunion. He also acknowledges that his search has become even more difficult with the discovery of what is likely false information on his adoption papers. Nevertheless, he will continue to look for his birth family in Indonesia. “I am thankful for the opportunities my adopted parents gave me, but I am also sad for my biological parents who never had a chance to raise me.”

This article was published in thejakartapost.com with the title "Fake documents hamper Dutch-Indonesian adoptees' search for birth parentsDiscarded puppy Locky's luck turns in Moscow lockdown". Click to read: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2021/03/17/fake-documents-hamper-dutch-indonesian-adoptees-search-for-birth-parents.html?fbclid=IwAR0ggLo8BXtCV0AM99nGe_2xFLIW31aetjzM9EFZxiuX7eY5n2BVlb9IBvk.

Download The Jakarta Post app for easier and faster news access:

Android: http://bit.ly/tjp-android

iOS: http://bit.ly/tjp-ios

Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption

Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption

What to do if you think your, or your child’s, intercountry adoption was illegal or illicit

In Australia, intercountry adoptions are facilitated under the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (the Hague Convention)(link is external). This helps preserve the safety, rights and interests of children. The rights and best interest of the child are central to any decisions made about a child’s adoption.

The Australian Central Authority (ACA) and State and Territory Central Authorities (STCAs) are aware of the risks involved in intercountry adoption and only partner with countries who adhere to the Hague Convention.

If concerns or allegations about illicit and illegal adoption practices are raised we have the Protocol for Responding to Allegations of Illicit or Illegal Practices in Intercountry Adoption (the Protocol). It has been developed by the ACA for intercountry adoption under the Hague Convention, in consultation with STCAs. The protocol is reviewed periodically to make sure it adheres to best practice in preventing and addressing illicit or illegal practices in intercountry adoption.

Marriage, divorce, adoption — the 5 pleas by a BJP leader in SC that seek uniform civil laws

All 5 petitions were filed last year by BJP leader & lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay. In all of them, SC has issued notice, asking relevant govt authorities to respond.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court currently has five petitions pending before it that demand uniformity in civil laws in the country on five aspects — age of marriage, divorce, succession, maintenance and adoption.

All the petitions were filed last year by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay. And in all of them, the apex court has issued notice, asking the relevant government authorities to respond.

The petition seeking uniform age of marriage demands that the marriageable age for both men and women should be increased to 21 years.

The remaining four PILs have the same demand — either the Supreme Court should direct the government to “remove anomalies” in different laws, or it should frame guidelines itself to declare such “discriminatory grounds” of succession, adoption, maintenance and divorce as unconstitutional.

Sri Lanka adoption: The babies who were given away

Thousands of Sri Lankan babies were put up for adoption between the 1960s and 1980s - some of them sold by "baby farms" to prospective parents across Europe. The Netherlands, which accepted many of those infants, has recently suspended international adoptions following historical allegations of coercion and bribery. As that investigation unfolds, families who never stopped thinking about the children who vanished hope they will be reunited.

Indika Waduge remembers the red car driving off with his mother and sister, Nilanthi, inside. He and his other sister Damayanthi stayed at home and waited for their mother to return. When she came back the next day, she was alone.

"When we said goodbye to each other I never thought Nilanthi was about to go abroad or it was the last time we'd see each other," he says.

This was in either 1985 or 1986, when Indika's father had left his mother Panikkarge Somawathie to raise three children alone. As the family struggled to survive, he remembers a man his mother knew convincing her to give Nilanthi, who was four or five, up for adoption.

Indika Waduge