Home  

Everybody’s Children

July 5, 2010
Everybody’s Children
By Diana Markosian
RIA Novosti
http://www.russiaprofile.org/files.site/bw.gif
The International Scandals Surrounding Foreign Parents Who Abuse Adopted Russian Children Have Obscured the Challenges that Russian Orphans Face at Home

Tucked quietly away in an isolated corner of Russia, far from civilization, is an orphan village called Kitezh Children’s Community. The houses are shaped like castles, the sun is beaming and a dozen or so happy children are playing in the yard, just like in every good fairy tale. But this is not your average Russian orphanage. Only a few lucky orphans from the thousands growing up in modern Russia are privileged enough to live here; volunteer parents, able to provide a home and a future, officially adopt the children.

Twenty-five year old Maria Pichugina is the director of the Kitezh center in Orion, about 60 kilometers south of Moscow. She has spent most of her life in the orphanage, but not as a foster child. Pichugina’s mother moved to Kitezh ten years ago with her two daughters to devote her life to the plight of Russian orphans. 

The community was set up nearly 20 years ago by former Moscow-based radio journalist Dmitri Morozov in response to the growing number of street children in Russia, and as an alternative to the state institutions. “In the 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, there were a lot of kids who didn’t have homes, and no one cared,” Morozov said. “People were too busy worrying about making money. There was an attitude on behalf of the government and on behalf of the people that this was not our problem.”

The situation has barely improved since then. According to a 2008 trial census, Russia has around 700,000 orphans. The vast system of orphanages presently in place dates back to the early Soviet period, when many orphans appeared on the streets following the Civil War, and orphanages became part of the communist education system. Since then it has grown and perpetuated itself, while alcoholism and the general destructive tendencies in society supplied children in need of parental care. Up to 80 percent of children in today’s orphanage system are so-called “social orphans” who have been taken by the authorities away from their problematic families.

The recent cases of mistreatment of Russian adoptive children in the United States have brought the pitfalls of international adoption into the limelight, but several fundamental questions have been brushed over: why does Russia have so many orphans in the first place? And what is the country doing to solve the problem?

More than 1,500 Russian children were adopted in the United States in 2009, putting Russia in third place in the number of children taken from there after China and Ethiopia. Over the years, Morozov has kept a close eye on Russia’s adoption trend, and believes that international adoption is the country’s way of ignoring the actual problem. “It seems to be the easiest way for bureaucrats who don’t care very much about what is really happening,” said Morozov. “In the last few years we have actually been moving in the right direction. I see that the government is trying to develop the structure: for instance, non-governmental organizations are emerging. But Russia is a big society and we have to contain the problem.”

For years, a major hurdle in the adoption process in Russia was its bureaucracy. Deacon Alexander Volkov adopted a son three years ago. The process itself, he said, was the most difficult part, and for many Russians it is an ordeal they are not willing to go through. “It was very hard for years to adopt a child. The system just didn’t allow it, and people didn’t want to deal with it,” said Volkov. “Now the government and volunteers are starting to take care of this situation. Many orphanages are even closing because people are adopting so many children.”

But while negotiations on an agreement to regulate Russian-U.S. adoptions draw to a close, Russia’s domestic orphan problem lingers on. The Russian Children’s Welfare Society (RCWS), a non-governmental organization based in New York with an office in Moscow, estimates that the proportion of declared orphans is four to five times higher in Russia than in Europe or the United States. Some 30 percent live in orphanages. Most are children who have been either given up by their parents or removed from dysfunctional families by the authorities. As of 2009, there were 2,176 orphanages in Russia. That number has grown by more than 100 percent in the last decade, reports RCWS, whose main mission is to help Russian orphans. 

Morozov believes that the problem is twofold: the number of abandoned children is rising but too few Russians are willing to take them in as their own. At Kitezh, things are different, he says; adoptive parents are not only willing to look after the children, but they also devote their entire lives to the cause. 

Pichugina and her husband have adopted five children in the past four years. She is now expecting her first biological child. “I don’t even think of them as anyone else’s children, but my own,” said Pichugina, whose own mother has adopted ten children in Kitezh. “Once you’ve taken them in you are inseparable from them. They are my own children.”

Anastasia and her younger sister Vera have lived with Pichugina for four years. Though at first glance they may act like the average teens, the two are wise beyond their years. They have to be, they say. Their mother and younger brother both died four years ago. “After she died, our father was too drunk to take care of us, and he left us,” said Anastasia, who is now 14. “Sometimes I feel sorry for myself, and just say: ‘why me?’ Life is not fair. But you have to get over it. I can’t do anything about what happened.”

The attitude toward orphans in Russia is slowly shifting. There is no overnight solution. Anastasia knows that her past will not define her, but she is part of the minority. The future for most Russian orphans is still rather nebulous

Lobby in contact with Cohn-Bendit

Message: 9669

From: ="smalltype">Von:Karen Husemann

Received: Mo Jul 05, 2010 4:26

Subject: Re: Betrifft: [Äthiopienforum] - LOBBY

Liebe Anke, lieber Jörg, liebes Forum,

Anke Hassel about Romania for Export Only - black hat

Message: 9666

From: ="smalltype">Von:hugh williamson

Received: Sa Jul 03, 2010 7:13

Subject: Re: Betrifft: [Äthiopienforum] - LOBBY

Lieber Jörg,

Let's not treat children as pets: Bombay high court

Let's not treat children as pets: Bombay high court
Mayura Janwalkar / DNA
Friday, July 2, 2010 0:53 IST
 
 
Mumbai: The Bombay high court on Thursday said that Indians have no right to brag about their culture and heritage, if their children in adoption centres are treated as “commodities”.
You may also want to see
·                                 SSC schools set to follow CBSE, introduce grade system
·                                 One Kurla rape culprit held, others at large
·                                 Ashok Chavan wants ministers to 'connect' with aam admi via janata durbars
·                                 Centre scheme comes to aid of failed adoptees
·                                 Students in a spot over Mumbai university's late call on PhD selection
Related videos
·                                 Heavy rains disrupt normal life in Mumbai
·                                 D Sivanandhan takes over as Maharashtra's police chief
·                                 Tadoba-Andheri Tiger Reserve officials happy with more space for tigers in reserve
The court was hearing a petition file by NGOs Advait Foundation and Sakhee, which had sought action against Preet Mandir, an adoption centre in Pune.
Peeved at the state of affairs, the court said the government, which is obligated to place children from adoption centres with caring families, had done little to stop it from becoming a “corporate venture”.
“We are very colour-conscious. Adoption centres charge more for a fair baby, while an HIV-positive child is offered at a discount,” justice BH Marlapalle said.
Interestingly, a letter written by government secretary Vandana Krishna to the Central Adoption Resources Agency (Cara), stated: “Even if an adoption agency is run with a selfish or business motive to make money, it is not a crime or illegal. Many schools, colleges, educational institutions, hospitals are run as a business today.”
Krishna’s letter stated that it is not the government’s duty to ensure that NGOs operate on charitable basis, nor is it necessary that adoption agencies should operate incurring losses.
Expressing concern over the 450 children at Preet Mandir, the court had earlier asked Cara to take a decision about the rehabilitation of these children. However, counsel for Preet Mandir told the court that closing the adoption centre — facing allegations of malpractices — would not solve the problem.
“The children are young and attached to the staff of the adoption centre. Many attend school and their psychology needs to be taken into consideration. Children are not vegetables or cattle to shift them from one place to another,” the counsel said.
The court asked the state to frame guidelines on how it plans to monitor private adoption homes. There are 69 adoption centres in Maharashtra.
“The state will have to play a very vital role,” the court said. It also suggested that information regarding adoption homes should be centralised and available online.
Justice Marlapalle said the matter has to be looked at in its totality by the state government. “On the one hand, we must go by the reality — number of unwed mothers, number of families selling children owing to abject poverty. We only hope that these [adoption centres] will not be breeding farms. Let us not treat children as pets.”

We hope adoption homes won’t be breeding farms: HC

We hope adoption homes won’t be breeding farms: HC

 

 

Expressing concern over the 450 children at Preet Mandir, the Bombay High Court on Thursday observed that we should not talk about rich culture and heritage of our country if we treat children in adoption homes as “commodities”.

 

 

The division bench of Justice B H Marlapalle and Justice Anoop Mohta were hearing petitions filed by NGOs Advait Foundation and Sakhee seeking action against Preet Mandir, alleging various irregularities by the adoption centre. Preet Mandir lawyer said closing down the adoption centre would not serve any purpose. The lawyer argued that the children are young and attached to the staff of the adoption centre and should not be treated as vegetables or cattle to shift them from one place to another.

 

 

Justice Marlapalle said the state government should look into the matter. “On the one hand, we must go by the reality — number of unwed mothers, number of families selling children owing to poverty. We only hope that these adoption centres will not be breeding farms. Let us not treat children as pets.” The court observed that even the government-run centres are full of malpractices. “It is the state’s responsibility. The number of such children is bound to go up while there is poverty in this country.” The court was of the view the government is duty-bound to rehabilitate the children in adoption centres, however, he said these are slowly turning into “corporate ventures”. The judges asked the government to formulate guidelines on how it plans to control private adoption homes. “We want the government to apply their mind independently, constitute a committee keeping in mind SC guidelines with respect to adoption,” the court said. The court has adjourned the hearing for four weeks.

Fri Jul 02 2010, 02:58 hrs

Don't treat kids in adoption centres like commodities: HC

Don't treat kids in adoption centres like commodities: HC
Rebecca Samervel, TNN, Jul 2, 2010, 06.39am IST
 
MUMBAI: "We should not talk about the rich culture and heritage of our country if we treat children in adoption homes as commodities." This is what the Bombay high court said on Thursday while expressing its anger at the state of adoption process in India. 

A division bench, comprising Justice B H Marlapalle and Justice Anoop Mohta, was hearing petitions filed by NGOs Advait Foundation and Sakhee seeking action against the Pune-based Preet Mandir, alleging various irregularities by the adoption centre. 

Expressing concern for the 450 children at Preet Mandir, the court had earlier asked the Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) to take a decision about the rehabilitation of these children. Arguing for Preet Mandir, senior counsel Prasad Dhakephalkar said that closing down the adoption centre would not serve any purpose. "Kids are not vegetables or cattle to be shifted from one place to another. The petition is based on a TV news report and should not be given much credence." 

Justice Marlapalle said the matter has to be looked at in its totality by the state government. "On one hand, we must take into consideration the actual number of unwed mothers and those selling off children due to poverty. We only hope that these (adoption centres) will not be breeding farms. Let us not treat children as pets." 

Expressing his dissatisfaction, Justice Marlapalle said that even government-run centres are full of malpractices. "It is the state's responsibility to rehabilitate the children in adoption centres. However, these are slowly turning into corporate ventures. Adoption centres charge more for a baby who is fair looking while an HIV positive child is offered at a discount,"he added. 

At the last hearing, the judges were informed that Cara has revoked the licence issued to Preet Mandir in 2007. The adoption centre has challenged the revocation of their licence before a different bench of the court and secured a stay. The judges said in view of the stay, the petitions could be clubbed and various issues could be raised before the other bench. The court will hear the matter after four weeks.
 

Centre scheme comes to aid of failed adoptees

Centre scheme comes to aid of failed adoptees
Mayura Janwalkar / DNA
Friday, July 2, 2010 0:55 IST
Mumbai: The integrated child protection scheme (ICPS) floated by the central government may come to the aid of children repatriated from failed adoptions.
The Bombay high court, which is in the process of framing guidelines to make foreign adoptions safer for children, said on Thursday that if the Central Adoption Resources Authority (Cara) had already appointed an expert committee to attend to the matter, they should have also constituted a fund for the welfare of children returning from failed adoptions.
After hearing the case of 14-year-old Mita who was repatriated to India after her adoptive parents — both US nationals — failed to look after her, on February 5, the court revoked the order granting Mita’s custody to them, five years after her adoption.
Jagannath Pati of the Cara told the court that 22 states had signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the union government to constitute ICPS under the Juvenile Justice Act.
Pati told the court that Maharashtra too is in the process signing the MoU. He said this fund could be utilised to cater to children whose adoptions, both domestic and international, have failed.
“So long as they have an earmarked fund, it would serve the purpose,” justice DY Chandrachud said.

Centre’s scheme to rehabilitate children

Centre’s scheme to rehabilitate children
Mumbai, July 02, 2010
First Published: 01:10 IST(2/7/2010)
Last Updated: 01:12 IST(2/7/2010)
The Centre is in the process of formulating Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS) for rehabilitating of children who are in need of child and care as defined under the Juvenile Justice Act.
Jagannath Pati, deputy director with the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) informed the Bombay high court on Thursday that the ICPS will be having a corpus fund which could be used
for rehabilitation of children who are repatriated after a failed international adoption.
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud is in the process of framing guidelines for better monitoring mechanism of international adoption and ensuring rehabilitation of children in case of failed adoption.
The court took up the matter after 14-year-old Anita (name changed) was repatriated to India after she could not adjust with her adoptive parents in the United States.
The Massachusetts-based couple had sent an application seeking revocation of their guardianship of Anita as she developed behavioural problems.
“You [CARA] also need to have guidelines for time-bound disbursement of the funds, especially in case where child is being repatriated,” Justice Chandrachud said.
Pati said that about 22 states have signed the memorandum for the ICPS and Maharashtra is in the process of signing it.
 

Overleg met Justitie inzake India (dossiers)

Overleg met Justitie inzake India (dossiers)

De afgelopen weken is in de media aandacht besteed aan “de zaak Rahul”. Het gaat hier om een adoptie waarvoor Meiling destijds bemiddeld heeft en waaraan al sinds 2005 met enige regelmaat in de pers aandacht besteed wordt.

In 2007 heeft Justitie aangekondigd onderzoek te doen naar hetgeen zich in de jaren 1995-2003 afgespeeld heeft in India. Over dat onderzoek heeft Justitie tot nu toe geen mededelingen gedaan. Het ontbreken van de feitelijke informatie maakt beoordeling van de zaak moeilijk.

Om te proberen meer duidelijkheid te krijgen heeft Meiling op 24 juni overleg gepleegd met het Ministerie van Justitie. In dat overleg hebben wij erop aangedrongen:
1. Met extra inzet te trachten informatie boven water te krijgen en daarvoor contact op te nemen met alle relevante organisaties,
2. Te trachten de adoptiedossiers van alle kinderen – welke in beslag genomen zijn door de politie – op een zodanige plaats onder te brengen dat deze eenvoudig toegankelijk zijn voor geadopteerde en familie.


Romania: in aumento il numero di neonati abbandonati negli ospedali

Romania: increasing the number of infants abandoned in hospitals 
And 'increasing the number of infants abandoned in Romanian maternity hospitals, in the first three months of 2010 were left 342 children, 88 more than last year. It 'as announced that the National Authority for Protection of the Family and the Rights of the Child (ANDPC) in Bucharest that drew an initial report on the phenomenon of early Romanian hospitals. Would be 118 babies abandoned in maternity wards, 181 departments of pediatrics, 43 in other departments of hospitals. 

To reduce the abandonment of the Romanian authorities have introduced a measure to ensure, under the emergency, the name and identity number (CNP) infants abandoned in hospitals.Under this measure employees of the Registry Office should issue within 30 days of the birth of children, birth certificates giving the name and identity number for babies abandoned by their mothers in maternity wards of hospitals. With this new measure babies abandoned in Romanian hospitals will see their guaranteed right to identity from birth, without waiting months and years as it was until today. With the decision to issue the document of birth of the baby will be made within 30 days since its abandonment in the hospital wards, the registration will be done in small registers and municipalities of the city where the baby was found. 

Meanwhile in Romania continues to mobilize Romanian associations for reopening the international adoptions. The campaign of pro-adoption lobby continues to collect signatures: almost 10 thousand accessions reached up to now in the streets of Romanian cities from volunteer associations that promote the campaign to collect signatures to present to the Romanian Parliament to request the amendment of Law 273 / 2004. Link to petition>> 

Campaign aims to reach 100 thousand signatures share to ensure that the Romanian institutions take into consideration the proposal submitted by the pro-adoption groups.

================================================

<<indietro