Kochi: HC has emphasized that a mere entry as ‘adopted' in a baptism register or certificate does not confer the legal status of adoption, ruling that only a valid adoption made following the applicable Civil Law is recognized under Canon Law.

Justice A Badharudeen's ruling came while dismissing an appeal by Mary Joseph of Alappuzha and her adopted son John George, challenging a civil court order that declared the adoption invalid and denied John any legal rights to his deceased adoptive father's property.

Mary contended that she and her husband had adopted John from a Children's Home in 1989, with full inheritance rights as a biological child. However, after her husband's death, his siblings filed a suit claiming rights to the property.

Upon reviewing the adoption records, HC noted the district court, Kottayam, had only appointed Mary and her late husband as guardians of the minor boy and directed the Children's Home to hand over custody, without granting adoption.

HC, referring to Supreme Court precedents, reiterated that only an adoption compliant with Civil Law is recognized under Canon Law. HC further stated that to establish a valid adoption, there must be concrete evidence of the formal process, including the physical act of giving and receiving the child.

My name is Saviëlle, I am 29 years old and come from Harderwijk. At the age of 2 I was adopted from China. On March 16th I received the incredible news that a DNA match was found with my biological parents. This came as a huge shock - it feels like the impossible has become reality.

Why I want to share this

I know that there are many adoptees in the Netherlands who, like me, never went looking because they thought it was impossible. But thanks to technological advances and the help of volunteers and organizations, much more is possible today.

With my story I hope to inspire other adoptees to give it a try if they have ever thought about it. Sometimes the chance of success is greater than you think.

I would really appreciate it if my story could be shared. If you are interested or know someone who can help with this, I would love to hear from you. Thank you in advance for your time!

Minister of State for Women and Child Development, Savitri Thakur said at present, there are only 22 adoption orders pending at DM level across the country as per the CARINGS portal.

NEW DELHI: Over 30,000 Indian parents are waiting for adoption in the country, the centre informed the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday.

In a written reply, Minister of State for Women and Child Development, Savitri Thakur, said there are 32,856 In-Country Prospective Adoptive Parents (PAPs) and 859 Inter-Country Prospective Adoptive Parents (PAPs) waiting for adoption as per data on Child Adoption Resource Information and Guidance System (CARINGS) portal.

She said the WCD ministry is the nodal ministry for the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act, 2015) which is the primary legislation for ensuring safety, security, dignity and wellbeing of children in need of care and protection.

The functionaries of the states and UTs implement the Act through institutions like State Adoption Resource Agencies, local Child Welfare Committees and District Child Protection Units (DCPUs).

A fund to provide therapy for adopted children will continue, the government has confirmed, after families criticised uncertainty over its future.

Families had been calling for clarity for months about the adoption and special guardian support fund, which expired on Monday.

Children and Families Minister Janet Daby recognised the delay had caused "a very difficult time" for many people but said £50m had been allocated for the fund for this year.

MPs welcomed the announcement, but said the delay had left families "in limbo", with some therapy stopped and services closed because of the hiatus.

Daby did not confirm when applications for the fund would reopen.

Based on its multi-layered work at individual casework and research levels as well as through its capacity building, technical assistance and evidence-based advocacy initiatives, ISS wishes to draw the ACERWC’s attention to the following issues that put children’s rights at risk in the African continent and beyond:

National child protection systems continue to require further strengthening through concrete capacity building initiatives and the development of technical resources that allow for harmonised, multisectoral and efficient approaches among child protection professionals. Through its work in Morocco, in collaboration with UNICEF Morocco and the Ministry of Solidarity, ISS is engaged in advancing the protection of children in vulnerable situations, whether they remain in their family environment or are placed in the child protection system through robust gatekeeping mechanisms, quality family-based alternative care options and family reintegration. However, ISS observes steadily decreasing budgets in child protection and prevailing obstacles to achieving sustainable change for children and families through effective prevention services and schemes. ISS work in Ivory Coast is an example of how to try to address root causes of child abandonment (2024 Study), advance on introducing specialised foster care and develop community-based solutions for families and children with disabilities.

Both countries responsible for worst kind of human rights violation, says MP Katrine Daugaard

Katrine Daugaard, a member of Denmark’s Liberal Alliance Party, urged the Danish government to launch an impartial legal investigation into irregularities in past overseas adoptions from Korea, stressing that both the sending and receiving countries must take responsibility for misconduct in adoption practices.

"The work and probe results that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) has made are super important. This is a call upon the Danish Parliament to investigate Danish authorities and adoption agencies," Daugaard told The Korea Times via email, Tuesday.

"I can’t say I was surprised by the results because I have read so many government files and case documents. It is very important for the people in both countries involved that the government takes responsibility for finding out the truth however dark it is," she added.

Her remarks follow March 26 announcement by the Korean commission on its initial investigation into overseas adoptions, which found government responsibility for human rights violations in intercountry adoptions from the 1960s to the 1990s. Of the 367 cases filed, Danish adoptees accounted for 227, or about 62 percent of the total.

Right now, key documents about international adoptions are about to be transferred to the National Archives, where access to the documents will be limited. This deprives adoptees of the right to full insight into their own cases.

This is a debate post. The post expresses the writer's own opinion.

In November 2023, the government launched a historical study to uncover the area of ​​adoption.

But the investigation will neither conclude whether the adoptions were illegal, nor reveal whether lack of supervision and knowledge on the Danish side has led to violations of Danish adoption law and the human rights of Danish citizens.

The latest revelations from India, as shown in DR's " The Great Adoption Theft ", and Lebanon from the podcast " Falske minder " have documented, among other things, that Danish supervisory authorities and adoption agencies have approved adoptions that were illegal. They have participated in this, knowing full well that the mediation cooperation with the sending countries was problematic and illegal. In addition, inquiries from biological parents have also been ignored.

— AFAA, Cradle of Hope Permanently from Conducting Adoptions in Liberia

The government, through the Ministry of Gender and Social Protection, has acted decisively against an American adoption agency for what it termed as serious criminal activities and mismanagement.

The Americans for African Adoptions (AFAA) and its affiliate, Cradle of Hope, an orphanage, are involved in serious child abuse and welfare violations as uncovered in a sweeping police investigation. The government has revoked the operation licenses of the orphanage and the adoption agency permanently. 

In a letter dated February 19, 2024, which contents are still concealed from the public, the Ministry of Gender, informed AFAA’s Country Director, Ms. Oretha James, that the adoption agency’s accreditation and sector clearance were being revoked for “widespread abuse and neglect” based on the report by the Liberia National Police.

“After a careful review of the investigative report from the Liberia National Police and legal opinions from within the Ministry’s legal arm, regarding the allegations of ‘Rape/Endangering the Welfare of Children involving Thirty (30) Children at Americans for African Adoption Orphanage,’ your accreditation and sector clearance are hereby revoked permanently in accordance with Article X, Subsection 15 of the Children Law of 2011,” Minister Gbeme Horace-Kollie wrote in her February 19, letter.

South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission(TRC) has confirmed some of the overseas adoption cases from the 1970s and 1980s as human rights violations and recommended the Korean government to officially apologize to its victims. It is the first time for a government agency to recognize human rights violations in past overseas adoptions and acknowledge the state’s responsibility. 

The commission’s decision includes illegal donation practices exposed earlier by the Korea Center for Investigative Journalism(KCIJ)-Newstapa. Newstapa’s investigation shed light on how certain adoption agencies had increased the business profitability of overseas adoption by forcing donations from adoptive parents and had them as unofficial income sources. By forcing donations, Korean adoption agencies were able to take an amount of money that exceeded the standard adoption fee set per child.

The commission’s decision is significant as it officially acknowledges the human rights violations experienced by Korean-born overseas adoptees. However, the announcement immediately faced criticisms due to its limitations.

TRC’s findings of 2.5-year-investigation

Kendrapada: A court in Jagatsinghpur district sentenced a woman and her adopted brother to life imprisonment on Saturday for murdering their mother in 2021, who had opposed their illicit relationship.

Mani Kandi (33) and Rajesh Kandi (29) were found guilty of strangling their mother, Urmila Kandi, to death in Bandar village. District and sessions judge Srinibash Pratihari also imposed a fine of Rs 5,000 each on the convicts, with an additional three-month sentence if they fail to pay.

According to the prosecution, Urmila had adopted Rajesh, her sister's son, following her husband's death. Mani, who was deserted by her husband, had returned to live with her mother. The duo developed a relationship, which Urmila strongly opposed, leading to frequent arguments.

On the night of June 22, 2021, during a heated argument, the convicts strangled Urmila and attempted to bury her body near their house. Villagers caught them in the act and informed police.

Public prosecutor Bhajahari Kar said the conviction was based on testimonies from 23 witnesses, postmortem reports, and other evidence. The court found both accused guilty under IPC sections 302 (murder) and 34 (common intention).